U.S.A. The Republic
How You Lost It!
To Return To This Menu,
Barack Hussein Obama II
The Undocumented Alien President of the United States
Arizona Secretary of State places Barack Obama Jr. on year 2012 Election
|Other Items of Interest||
Email Message to the Legislators of the States
Alaska Candidate, Lisa Murkowski, "usurps" Office of U.S. Senator
Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act
Barack Obama's Health Care Chart
Mike Laverne interviews a Neurosurgeon
The Mondo Politico Library [outside page link]
Political Science Degree [outside page link]
On January 30th, 2013 we saw George Town
Law Professor Louis Michael Seidman on CBS Says
'Let's Give Up On The Constitution'
|[YouTube Video Link]|
|Law Professor Louis Michael Seidman is a Professor of Georgetown "Jesuit" University and the Catholic "Jesuits" have been at WAR with the Protestants for over three-hundred years. It is the desire of the "Jesuits" to destroy all Protestant Churches and all Protestant Republican governments of the States. Do you not see why 'Professor Seidman' wants to destroy our Federal Constitution?|
There is a need to inform entities that this New States Constitution denies most of the freedoms that you now enjoy, and while it is worded in legal terminology to give it the appearance of creating something that will diminish crime and so forth, it is also creating a police state such as the reserving of all powers now given in the New States Constitution to the police.
This need to inform indicates that this kind of phraseology as that which means everything except what is covered in this Constitution, the police then can make up any rules they want for any situation that is not covered in this document. That there are so many similar and tricky phrases in the New States Constitution that there will be little room for anyone to move or have any rights of freedom, including freedom of speech, assembly, etc.; that it will make it almost impossible to ever escape from the domination of these laws, or to ever again gain freedoms that have been allowed under the Constitution.
A CONSTITUTION FOR THE NEWSTATES OF AMERICA from the book, "THE EMERGING CONSTITUTION" by Rexford G. Tugwell, published 1974 illustrates with chilling clarity the final objective of regional governance conspirators. The goal is a corporate state concentrating economic, political and social powers in the hands of a ruling elite. "A Constitution for the Newstates of America," is the fortieth version of this revolutionary document prepared by a team of social experimenters at the "CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS," "Fund for the Republic" (Ford Foundation, Post Office Box 4068, Santa Barbara, California 93103.
The Center, its first objective accomplished, has appointed socialist - oriented University of Denver Chancellor Maurice B. Mitchell as its new head and may merge with the "Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies," a Colorado-based world government policy promotion agency.
Eric is a retired Army who served as public officer at Rucker from 1989 to 1991, wrote this letter to former President, Bill Clinton. This is a must read letter.
Today we mourn the passing of an old friend, by the name of 'Common Sense'.
'Common Sense' lived a long life but died in the United States from heart failure just after the new millennium. No one really knows how old he was, since his birth records were long ago lost in bureaucratic red tape.
If we look beneath the surface of our public affairs, we can discern one fundamental fact, namely: a great redistribution of power between society and the State. This is the fact that interests the student of civilization. He has only a secondary or derived interest in matters like price-fixing, wage-fixing, inflation, political banking, "agricultural adjustment," and similar items of State policy that fill the pages of newspapers and the mouths of publicists and politicians. All these can be run up under one head. They have an immediate and temporary importance, and for this reason they monopolize public attention, but they all come to the same thing; which is, an increase of State power and a corresponding decrease of social power.
The courts have decided that you have no right to expect the police to protect you from crime! Incredible as it may seem, the courts have ruled that the police are not obligated to even respond to your calls for help, even in life threatening situations!
A lot has been said about conspiracy.
Myron Faganis an expert on the "Illuminati" and the "Council on Foreign Relations."He has detailed the events and the players who have played a role in setting up the "New World Order." Myron Faganalso details as to how the "United Nations"and the "Council oncame into being and their role in the order of things. Foreign Relations"
The "Protocols of Zion" were referred to in the late 1700s. The first copy available to public scrutiny surfaced in the early 1800s. Every aspect of this plan to subjugate the world has since become reality, validating the authenticity of conspiracy. This is an exact reprint of the original text.
This is the first real evidence found that our current Social, Financial, and Legal system was deliberately designed to enslave humanity.
The Pledge Of Allegiance [Audio Files]
Do you know the meaning of words that is found in the "Pledge Of Allegiance" for the United States of America? A lot of debates have taken place when the judiciary of the United States declared that the words: "Under God" in the "Pledge Of Allegiance" could no longer be recited in the public schools of America. [See the below Case of "Newdow v. Congress"]. The case of "Newdow v. Congress" was later overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The recording must be heard and the Red Skelton recording is recorded in "Adobe Flash Player" audio format.
Red Skeleton and John Wayne gives us their understanding of the words in the "Pledge Of Allegiance." The videos are recorded in "Flash" video format. There are also other interesting "Flash" videos relating to the "Pledge Of Allegiance" at this Internet Link.
Did you know that George Washington was visited by an Angel and was given a vision about the future of the United States of America? George saw three separate Wars that were to be fought on the soil of the United States. Two of the three Wars have come to past; one is yet to come. The vision of George Washington is catalogued in the Library of Congress.
An American evangelist recorded the following supernatural vision in the year 1954. Research reveals that not only are the prophecies of this vision true to the Scriptures quoted therein, but scientific and military leaders today are aware that these things are coming to pass or are very plausible in light of modern technological advances. The evangelist remains anonymous.
The Federal Reserve operates a Ponzi scheme. Congress can pay for federal expenses with funds collected from taxes, imposts, and duties, but congress is never satisfied with this amount. Jim Carter explains the Federal Reserve Bank Ponzi scheme and why it will fail.
Dont point to that beloved parchment, the Constitution, as a symbol of your enduring freedom. It is representative of a form of government which seemingly no longer exists in this country today. The Constitution has been thrown out the window, the Republic shoved aside and replaced with a democracy. The thing is; most people in this country remain unaware that this is so because they simply do not know the truth what lies beyond the myths.
LYSANDER SPOONER tells us that for more than six hundred years - that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 - there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws. This is the full essay on Trial by Jury at common law that was written by Lysander Spooner in the year of 1852.
This is the infamous case of "Newdow v. Congress" wherein the federal judges of the United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it was unconstitutional for children to recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" in public schools.
The "Houston Law Review" reviews the case of "Newdow v. Congress" and gives us a detailed historical overview of the "Pledge of Allegiance."
Previous to "Flag Day," June 14, 1923 there were no federal or state regulations governing display of the United States Flag. It was on this date that the "National Flag Code" was adopted by the "National Flag Conference" which was attended by representatives of the Army and Navy which had evolved their own procedures, and some 66 other national groups. This purpose of providing clear guidance based on the Army and Navy procedures relating to display and associated questions about the U.S. Flag was adopted by all organizations in attendance.
Does the "First Amendment" give us the right to desecrate the American flag? Or is the flag a sacred symbol of our nation, deserving protection by law? Tough call? "The Solution" for those who want to light Old Glory on fire, stomp all over it, or spit on it to make some sort of "statement," I say let them do it. But under one condition: they MUST get permission from three sponsors - -
Federalism Unmasked or the rights of the States, the Congress, the Executive, and the People, vindicated against the encroachments of the Judiciary, prompted by the modern apostate democracy. Being the compilation from the writings and speeches of the leaders of the old Jeffersonian Republican Party.
Abraham Lincoln was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of the Hapsburg royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a White House reception in 1862. The German royal family member demanded a pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. The blows to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to participate in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the reception room." What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and upset the royal European personage?
The following information was derived from information that exists in the Smithsonian, National Archives, the Congressional Library, Courtroom Police files, public and private libraries and storage vaults across the United States and Europe: "
The delusion that sovereignty is vested in the whole people of the United States is one of the strangest misconceptions of our public life" (p. 15). Lincoln espoused this fable in order to make the preposterous argument that no such thing as state sovereignty ever existed; the states were never at any time free and independent of the federal government; they did not in fact create the federal government by ratifying the Constitution; and that, therefore, no group of citizens could ever secede from the federal government.
The cornerstone of the Lincoln Legend is a spectacular lie. As eloquently stated by former syndicated columnist James J. Kilpatrick in his 1957 book, "The Sovereign States": "
Few Americans realize that There are three definitions for the "United States." Most have been misled to believe that the term "United States" has a single meaning and is a generic term referring to the country as a whole. Not always so. The legal standing of each individual American to any one of the three varies depending on his lack of status or his status in law. If you are a citizen of the District of Columbia (the Democracy) you have privileges granted by congress -- Or, if you are a Citizen of the Union (the Republic) you are endowed with Rights -- some of which are unalienable.
Both concurrently exist today. The corporate system has been gaining predominance in the last 70 years. Many Sovereigns have contracted with the corporate system unknowingly, unintentionally, and or without full disclosure. Which one do you want for yourself and your posterity? Once you know the difference, you may have to make a decision for yourself, your family, and your posterity. That decision may require changes in how you do things. You may have to undo what has been done and make your Sovereign status known. This is not taught in government schools, because they do not want you to know this. They want power and control over the masses they call "Human Resources."
Ever had a friend or a neighbor who waxed nostalgic about the "good old days" when "the world used to be so simple?" Who lamented the time when media always told the truth, at least as most readers thought? Who missed the days when patriotism, national pride or "motherhood and apple pie" weren't cynically snickered at by the "cool" liberal-globalists as old-fashioned ideas whose time has passed? Or who just thought that "life was more fun" back then?
Well, if you're like the millions of Americans who feel that way today; who resent being ruled by the big business elites; who have lost trust in our once democratic institutions; who want to feel proud of their country again - wax nostalgic no more! Join the readers whom Bob Djurdjevic's "Truth in Media" editorials and columns have been enchanting and often moving to action. From business leaders to academics; from homemakers to economists; from clergymen to college students - Djurdjevic's pieces have drawn worldwide accolades and admiration.
U.S. Law is Private Merchant Law, leaving the people as "Surety" and "Debtor" on the bankruptcy. Law is contract, universally and in the U.S., so we must follow the progression of contractual agreements which constitute the underlying U.S. Law. This document gives us the chronological order of contract law that leaves the citizens of the United States as the "Surety" and "Debtor" on the bankruptcy.
A brief dissertation exposing the true nature and cause of modern criminal accusations by Valiant Liberty.
The Family Guardian exists as a free public service. Its sole focus is to strengthen, stabilize, and empower families and individuals by providing information on many subjects. There is a lot of good reading at this web site.
A constitution differs from a statute or ordinary act of legislation in three important particulars: . . . .
State of Alaska Marijuana Ballot Initiative
The "People" of the "State of Alaska"
voted into "Law" the "Alaska Marijuana
Ballot Initiative" (2014) and the "Alaska State Legislature"
will be reviewing that "Ballot Initiative"
for implementation. Mr. Epperly gives "Testimony in Opposition"
to the implementation of the "Ballot Initiative"
into a "Law" for the State of Alaska."
Alaska Marijuana Legalization -- Ballot Measure 2 - (2014)
The "People" of the "State
of Alaska" approved "Ballot
Measure 2" into law. Here is the full text of that "Marijuana
Ballot Measure" with "Legislative
Affairs Agency Summary."
A "Petition for a Redress of Grievance" was filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska on April 15, 2015. The "Petition" was filed for the purpose of the Court to resolve a controversy of laws that exist with the use of "Marijuana" between the State of Alaska and The United States of America.
State of Alaska filed a "Motion to Dismiss" pleading "Failure to State a Claim" and "Want of Standing" for Mr. Epperly to bring his "Petition for Redress of Grievance" before the U.S. District Court. An "Exception and Opposition" has been filed.
Mr. Epperly filed an "Opposition" to the State of Alaska's "Motion to Dismiss." Also filed was a "Motion for Summary Judgment on the Pleadings." Mr. Epperly believes that he has destroyed the "Motion to Dismiss."
State of Alaska has submitted its reply to Mr. Epperly's Opposition to "State's Motion to Dismiss" and Opposes Epperly's "Motion for Summary Judgment." Mr. Epperly agreed with the Opposition to the "Summary Judgment" and had the "Motion" removed from the Record of the Court.
The Respondent, "The United States of America," has submitted its "Motion To Dismiss.'" The Petitioner, Gordon Warren Epperly, has "Objected" to the "Motion."
The Petitioner, Gordon Warren Epperly has filed his "Objection" to The United States "Motion to Dismiss." Does Mr. Epperly have "standing" to obtain a "Declaratory Judgment" regarding the use of "Marijuana"?
The Respondent, "The United States of America," has submitted its "Reply" to Mr. Epperly's "Opposition to 'United States Motion to Dismiss'." Attached to the United States "Reply" is the Court Case which Attorney Richard L. Pomeroy has relied upon to show that Mr. Epperly has no "Standing" to present a "Petition for Redress of Grievance" requesting "Declaratory Judgments." Notwithstanding the assertion of Attorney Richard L. Pomeroy, the attached case of "Montana Environmental Information Center v. Stone-Manning, 766 F.3d 1184" shows that Mr. Epperly has "Standing" and the pertinent parts of that case are "boxed" with sideline comments.
The Attorney for the Respondent, "The United States of America" continues to allege that the Petitioner, Gordon Warren Epperly has no "standing" to question the policy of the U.S. Attorney General to delegate the "Powers" of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. President to regulate and execute the "Federal Control Substance Laws" on "Marijuana" to the States of the Union. "Title 5 of the United States Code at Sections 701 thru 706" should put the question of "standing" to rest. The Attorney for the Respondent, State of Alaska has taken the position that under the doctrine of "Federalism," the States of the Union are not subject to the "Federal Control Substance Law" as that law applies to "Marijuana." The case of "United States of America v. Michael Carl Visman, 919 F.2d 1390" says otherwise.
Here is a listing to Relevant Court Cases as required by Local Rule 40.2 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska. Also this document addresses Judge Robert E. Blackburn's "Court Order To Sever" sections of the "Complaint" of "Safe Streets Alliance et al., v. Alternative Holstic Healing, LLC et al.," (see below) on grounds that the Plaintiffs most likely does not have "standing" to bring a private action into the Court declaring the "Statutes" of the State of Colorado are "null and void" as being preempted by the "Federal Control Substance Law." This "Court Order" has been addressed within this "Motion to add additional cases into the Record of the Court."
In this case, the federal government charged 16 persons in a Sacramento federal court with a single charge of conspiracy to grow 1,000 or more marijuana plants between Feb 2008 and October 2011 in Trinity and Tehama counties. 1,000 plants is the magic number that makes the minimum sentence (with a couple of small exceptions) upon conviction 10 years in prison; 100 or more marijuana plants nets at least 5 years in prison. Several of the Defendants moved the Court to dismiss the Indictment which was denied on April 17, 2015.
(Memo) - Collection of U.S. Justice Department Letters and Memos
(Memo) - BATF on Marijuana and Firearms
These are the "Memos" which several "States" have relied upon as the authority to enact laws to legalize the use of "Marijuana" within their "States." I call your attention to the "Memo" of "U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag." If you own a "Firearm," be sure to read the "BATF" Memo.
U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder and his Deputy Attorney Generals have relied upon the "Theory of Prosecutorial Discretion" as their authority to alter and amend the "Federal Control Substance Law" and delegate the exclusive "Powers" of the "U.S. Congress" to regulate "Marijuana" under the "Interstate Commerce" clause of the "U.S. Constitution" to the States of the Union.
In the above Court Action of "Epperly vs. State of Alaska vs. The United States of America", Mr. Epperly brought the "Cause of Action" into the Court as a "Petition for Redress of Grievance," not as a "Complaint." As expected, the Attorneys for the "State of Alaska" and "The United States of America" have moved the Court to dismiss the "Petition" for want of "Standing" of a "Complaint." This "Article" on our "Right" to "Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievance" explains what is that "Common Law Right" and how (over a period of time) the Federal Judges have destroyed this provision of the U.S. Constitution.
U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, has now retired and former U.S. Attorney, Loretta Lynch, has been promoted and confirmed by the U.S. Senate to be the next U.S. Attorney General. The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee has presented several questions to Loretta Lynch on "Marijuana." This is a list of the questions raised and the answers given by Loretta Lynch.
Here is a letter addressed to James M. Cole as the U.S. Deputy Attorney General questioning his authority to delegate "Powers" of "The United States of America" to the "Governors" of the "States" to execute and enforce the "Marijuana Prohibition Laws and Treaties" of the government of "The United States of America."
This letter addresses Alaska Senate Bill No. 08 in establishing of a "Hemp" culture within the State of Alaska. Attached to this letter is a paper addressing that failure of the "Hemp" industry of the State of North Dakota for being in conflict with the "Federal Control Substance Acts."
This is an e-mail message addressed to the members of the "Alaska State Legislature." The message advises the "Legislators" that they have a duty to assure its "Citizens" of the safety to use "Marijuana" for "Human Consuption," and as the "U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency" has put everyone on "Notice" through the "Federal Register" that "Marijuana" has no use for medical purposes and it is a dangerous drug that should never be used for any purpose whatsoever, the "Marijuana Ballot Inititives" places every "State" in a state of liability for "Tort" action.
Most of our Officials of the Municipal governments have no idea that the enacting of "Ordnances" and issuing "Permits," "Licenses," and other "Documents" to allow "Marijuana Pot Shops" to be established in their Cities are placing themselves in jeopardy of being charged with "Federal Crimes." This letter explains the problem.
This is a letter addressed to the members of the "Assembly" for the "City and Borough of Juneau" (Alaska) as a follow up to the first letter giving "notice of liability" of being arrested and prosecuted for violating the laws of the "United States." This letter was accompanied with a "Memo" from "U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag" explaining the "Policies" of the "U.S. Justice Department" in regard to the "States" authorizing the use of "Marijuana."
U.S. Attorney, Sally Amanda Marshall" of her "errors" in reporting within the "Newspapers" of our "Nation" that "Native Indians" of "Indian Reservations" may use "Marijuana" for recreational and medical purposes.
This letter informs "
Associated Press" (AP) Article as published in the Newspapers of our Nation wherein it was reported that several members of Congress are considering introducing legislation to discourage the States from legalizing the use of Marijuana. U.S. Rep. Trent Franks is one of those who would like to sponsor such legislation.
This letter addresses an "
This letter was mailed in obligation to report crimes that are cognizant to the Federal Courts under the mandate of 18 USC 4, "Misprision of felony." This letter reports "Deputy Attorney General, James M. Cole" as committing the crime of "aiding" and "abetting" the commission of crimes against the "Laws" of the "United States."
This letter addresses the need to adopt "emergency legislation" directed at the "Governor" and "Attorney General" for the "State of Alaska" to declare the "Alaska Marijuana Ballot Initiative" to "null and "void" for being in conflict with the "Federal Controlled Substance Acts" and thus being unconstitutional.
This letter addresses the "supremacy" of the laws of "U.S. Congress" to regulate "Marijuana" as a commodity that moves through commerce under the "Interstate Commerce Clause" of the "U.S. Constitution." This "PDF Document" has several "Video Links" to videos on the use of "Marijuana" within the "States."
This letter to the "Alaska State Legislature" addresses the "Power" of "Congress" to regulate "Marijuana" under the "Interstate Commerce Clause" of the "U.S. Constitution"
This letter to the "Alaska State Legislature" introduces a Brief by AICPA (Certified Public Accountants) giving them a study of the Marijuana Laws as adopted by the State of Colorado and the State of Washington and its impact upon the Banks and Businesses of those States. This Brief was updated January 5, 2015
This letter to the "Alaska State Legislature" addresses issues that have been overlooked in regard to the legalization of the use of "Marijuana." The legalization of "Marijuana" may jeopardize the "World Tourist Industry" of the "State" by violating the laws that govern "Cruise Ships" and other issues.
This letter to the Alaska State Legislature address misconceptions and errors that were made in the Joint House and Senate Judiciary Committee of January 20th, 2015. This letter presents undisputable evidence that the Alaska Marijuana Ballot Initiative of year 2014 is unconstitutional, null and void.
This letter addresses Congressional "H.R 1523" of April 12 2013 wherein several "Congressman" tried to remove "Marijuana" from the penalty section of the "Federal Control Substance Law" for those that are in compliance with the "Marijuana Laws" of a "State." The "House Resolution" never was acted upon in "Committees."
This letter addresses "International Drug Treaties" and other issues. This letter puts the "Alaska Legislature" and "Attorney General" on notice that there is a "controversy" with the "State of Alaska" and "The United States of America" in regulating "Marijuana" that will have to be addressed and resolved by a "Federal Judge."
This "Petition to Reschedule Cannabis" was filed by "The Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis" with the "Federal Drug Enforcement Agency" (DEA) in an attempt to remove "Marijuana" from the "Schedule I" classification of being a dangerous drug that shall not be used for any purpose.
"The Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis" Petition to reschedule the "Federal Controlled Substance Law" from the "Schedule I" classification. This "Report" is very detailed as to why the "Petition" was denied.
Here are three "Articles" reporting on the "U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia" rejecting a lawsuit to order "DEA" to reconsider its ruling denying reclassification of "Marijuana" from a "Schedule I
Here is the full text of "The Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis" Petition for "Writ of Certiorari" which was filed with the "U.S. Supreme Court." The "Petition" was denied by the "Court."
Did you know that "Marijuana" has been "Patented" and the assignee of the "Patent" is "The United States of America Department of Health and Social Services." If "Marijuana" is "Patented," the question is raised: "By what authority does any "State" of the "Union" authorize the "farming," "distribution," and "sale" of "Marijuana" to anyone other than the one who holds the "Patent" on "Marijuana" ??? Here is the full text of the "Patent."
Several "Nations" of the "United Nations" entered into "Treaties" identifying "Marijuana" as a "Psychotropic Substance" to which the party "Nations" shall not declared "lawful" for any use whatsoever. The government of "The United States of America" is a party to those "Treaties ."
The States of Oklahoma and Nebraska moves the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to sue the State of Colorado for allowing "Marijuana" to be imported into their States. This appears to be a "nuisance" lawsuit to prevent the State of Colorado from violating the Federal Controlled Substance Law. This litigation was filed in December of 2014.
The States of Oklahoma and Nebraska motioned the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to sue the State of Colorado for allowing "Marijuana" to be imported into their States. Former DEA Administrators have filed an "Amici Curiae Brief" in support of the States of Oklahoma and Nebraska to sue the State of Colorado.
States of Oklahoma and Nebraska motioned the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to sue the State of Colorado for allowing "Marijuana" to be imported into their States. The States of Oregon and Washington have filed an "Amici Curiae Brief" in support of the State of Colorado to dismiss the lawsuit.
The State of Colorado has answered the States of Oklahoma and Nebraska "Leave to file a Complaint" with a "Brief in Opposition."
The States of Oklahoma and Nebraska has filed their "Reply Brief" in answer to the State of Colorado's "Brief in Opposition."
The States of Oklahoma and Nebraska has moved the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to sue the State of Colorado for allowing "Marijuana" to be imported into their States. This paper goes into a detailed discussion on the theory of "nuisance" litigations between the States.
More Lawsuits Against State of Colorado
The Marijuana Ballot Initiative of the State of Colorado was worded almost identical to the Marijuana Ballot Initiative No. 2 (2014) of the State of Alaska and other States of the Union. In these Ballot Initiatives, the Sponsors used the word lawful throughout. As the use of the word lawful is identical to each of those Marijuana Ballot Initiatives, the definition of that word lawful as given by the June 15, 2015 Colorado State Supreme Court must be given to the word lawful as used within those Ballot Initiatives" of all States:
Coats contends that the General Assembly intended the term lawful here to mean lawful under Colorado state law, which, he asserts, recognizes medical marijuana use as lawful. Coats, Ά 6, 303 P.3d at 149. We do not read the term lawful to be so restrictive.
The CSA lists marijuana as a Schedule I substance, meaning federal law designates it as having no medical accepted use, a high risk of abuse, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision. Id. at § 812(b)(1)(A)(C). This makes the use, possession, or manufacture of marijuana a federal criminal offense, except where used for federally-approved research projects. Id. at § 844(a); see also Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 14 (2005). There is no exception for marijuana use for medicinal purposes, or for marijuana use conducted in accordance with state law. 21 U.S.C. § 844(a); see also Gonzales, 545 U.S.at 29 (finding that [t]he Supremacy Clause unambiguously provides that if there is any conflict between federal and state law, federal law shall prevail, including in the area of marijuana regulation). Coatss use of medical marijuana was unlawful under federal law and thus not protected by [Colorado State Law] section 24‑34‑402.5.
As the laws of the government of "The United States of America" makes unlawful the use of "Marijuana," the use of "Marijuana" is also unlawful in all States.
Several Sheriffs for the "State of Colorado" have brought a lawsuit into the "U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado" stating that they have been damaged from the negligence of the Governor exceeding his authority in allowing the "Colorado Marijuana Ballot Initiative" to go into effect when the Governor and his Attorney General had full knowledge that the "Ballot Initiative" was "unconstitutional" for being in conflict with the "Federal Controlled Substance Act."
l. / +++
Safe Streets joined with "New Vision Hotels Two, LLC," which owns the Holiday Inn in Frisco, Colorado to sue a handful of members of the marijuana industry on racketeering charges. New vision is suffering injuries to its business and property caused by the operations of Summit Marijuana, a state-licensed recreational marijuana store that plans to open less than 75 yards from the front entrance of New Visions hote
The Reillys are Colorado property owners who have been injured by a conspiracy to cultivate recreational marijuana near their land, and they are members of Safe Streets. Plaintiffs seek redress under RICO, which requires those who engage in racketeering activity including the commercial production of marijuana to pay those they injure treble damages, costs, and attorneys fees. / +++/ +++ Comment: It appears that the above cases were prematurely filed for they assert damages from a business that does not exist. It is difficult to imagine that the Plaintiffs have established damages to warrant "Standing" before a Federal Court.
U.S. Congressional Representative, "Donna Christensen" D-VI inserted deep within the year 2015 "Appropriation Bill" a provision to withhold funds from the "U.S. Justice Department" to enforce the "Federal Controlled Substance Law" as that "Law" applies to "Marijuana" as used by those "States" that have adopted medical Marijuana laws. Also included is the "State of Colorado" response to the "Oklahoma" and "Nebraska" lawsuit.
Here is the full text of the case "UNITED STATES vs. OAKLAND CANNABIS BUYERS' COOPERATIVE and JEFFREY JONES, 532 U.S. ___ (2001)" wherein the Court declared that "The Controlled Substances Act, 84 Stat. 1242, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq., prohibits the manufacture and distribution of various drugs, including marijuana. In this case, we must decide whether there is a medical necessity exception to these prohibitions. We hold that there is not." U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas.
Here is the full text and Oral Argments of the case "GONAZLES vs. RAICH, (03-1454) - 545 U.S. 1 (2005)" giving us a detailed history of the regulation of "Marijuana" and the "Power" of the "U.S. Congress" to regulate "Marijuana" under the "Commerce Clause" of the "Constitution" for "The United States of America." This "Power" extends to the individual citizens of the "States" and declared that it is a crime for anyone to have any amount of "Marijuana" in their possession.
Here is an "Article" reporting on the "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit" rejecting a lawsuit to legalize "Medical Marijuana" with the full text of the "Court Opinion."
Here is an "Article" reporting that "State Laws" authorizing the use of "Medical Marijuana" will not keep you out of "Federal Prison." "State Laws" will not override "Federal Laws."
This "Top Secret" publication marks the 25th anniversary of the Third World War, called the "Quiet War," being conducted using subjective biological warfare, fought with "silent weapons."
This book contains an introductory description of this war, its strategies, and its weaponry.
Statement of Purpose - The "Avalon Project" will mount digital documents relevant to the fields of Law, History, Economics, Politics, Diplomacy and Government. We do not intend to mount only static text but rather to add value to the text by linking to supporting documents expressly referred to in the body of the text. We also intend to use hypertext means of annotating and indexing the texts. The "Avalon Project" will no doubt contain controversial documents. Their inclusion does not indicate endorsement of their contents nor sympathy with the ideology, doctrines, or means employed by their authors. They are included for balance, and because in some cases they are by our definition, a supporting document.
The "Department of Politics" at the "University of Keele" has provided an excellent page of Internet Links and Research Sources. This is the one of best Research Sources that we have been able to locate.
"The National Political Index" is a web site which provides an index of substantive political information for voters, political activists, political consultants, lobbyists, politicians, academicians, and media editors with a wide range of products, information, services, simulations, games, and polling in an interactive communications environment.