U.S.A. The Republic

How You Lost It!


Items of Interest

To Return To This Menu,
 Use Your Web Browser "Back" Button


Site Search

          Site Search              




Barack Hussein Obama II
The Undocumented Alien President of the United States
Flash Video    PDF  Barack Hussein Obama II - The Usurper

"Index Page" to several "Complaints" with supporting Documents and Videos.

It appears that Barack Hussein Obama entered into Office of President of the United States on the back of fraudulent Documents.   This " Index Page " provides several " Documents " and " Videos " with rulings of several State Administrative Law Courts.
PDF  State of Alaska - Epperly v. Obama

"Index Page" to an "Administrative Complaint" with supporting Documents.


An Administrative Complaint was filed with the Director of Elections for the Alaska Division of Elections.  The Complaint showed that there was reasonable doubt that Barack Hussein Obama II had the Office qualifications to be the President of the United States.  This Complaint is supported with Exhibits and Affidavits.  The Director of Elections received "Secret Orders" to "Ignore" the Complaint and not make any Rulings.

PDF  State of Georgia - Steve Ankeny v. Governor

"Index Page" to a "Complaint" with supporting Documents and Videos.

A Complaint was filed the Georgia Administrative Law Court that questioned the validity of a "Birth Certificate" of Barack Hussein Obama II.  The case was "dismissed" for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted for there are no Laws nor any provision in the United States Constitution that requires the production of "Birth Certificates" as a condition of Presidential qualifications.

PDF  Electoral College 

"Index Page" to an "Objection" and "Complaint" with supporting Documents


An "Objection and Complaint" was lodged with the "Electoral College" challenging the Electoral Votes for Barack Hussein Obama II.  A request is being made of the House and Senate of the U.S. Congress to make an investigation and submit a decision.


PDF   U.S. District Court "Complaint" of Guthrie vs. Obama  (02-11-13) 

This "Complaint" of Guthrie is the most articulated "Complaint" that has been written against Barack Hussein Obama II.  It is very well researched and you will find it very informative.  But as it was filed in a Court of a de-facto government of the United States, it went the way of the other Court Cases that questioned the Office qualifications of Barack Hussein Obama II.

PDF   Barack Obama Confirmed Ineligible for Office

PDF   Barack Obama Jr. Ineligible For President

PDF   Obama Eligibility Primer 

Is Barack Hussein Obama a “Natural Born Citizen” of the United States?  Although NO authenticated evidence has been offered to support the claim, those who claim that Obama was born in Hawaii would be claiming only that Obama is a “native born citizen” of the United States.  As “native born citizen” is NOT the requirement for president in the Constitution, this is an argument of no real consequence.

Flash Video    Natural Law & natural born Citizen  (Outside Video Link)

Paul Guthrie gives us a review of Constitution Article II natural born Citizen statement.  Mr. Guthrie explains why Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born Citizen of the United States and why he is not a legitimate United States President.  With Barack Hussein Obama sitting over the People as a King of a Monarchy is a statement that the U.S. Constitution is no longer a viable Document and we have a "de-facto" government of the United States on our hands.

This Video Lecture is one of the best on United States citizenship.  Very important to view.

Adobe PDF  Arizona Secretary of State places Barack Obama Jr. on year 2012 Election Ballots    

Arizona Secretary of State, Ken Bennett, issues a Press Release that the Health Department for the State of Hawaii has satisfied the legitimacy of a Birth Certificate and for that reason alone, Barack Obama Jr.'s name will appear on the Arizona Election Ballots.  A letter of exception has been submitted to explain the error of the decision.

Adobe PDF  Barack Obama Commits "Treason"

Barack Hussein Obama on March 21, 2011 committed an Act of Treason when he "Ordered" the Military of the United States to invade a foreign Country without Congressional approval.  This letter was mailed to the Office of the U.S. President and to several Members of the U.S. Congress calling for impeachment proceedings.

Adobe PDF   Have the Negroes the right to hold Public Offices?

The "New York Times" published an Article on March 6, 1868 telling us that the provisions of the "Reconstruction Acts" of 1868 made no provisions for Negroes to hold Public Offices.   This is a photocopy of that Article.

THERE ARE NO PROVISIONS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES CONSTITTUION THAT GRANTS "POLITICAL RIGHTS"  OF HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO NEGROES OR MULATTOS.  The only "Political Rights" that may be exercised by Negroes or Mulattos is the Right to "Vote" at Ballot Elections.   (See Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution).  Barack Hussein Obama II has no authority under the U.S. Constitution to hold any Public Office of the United States government.

Other Items of Interest
MS Word   Letter to Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court with a Declaration of Sovereignty

The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court was given notice that he administered an unlawful Oath of Office to Barack Obama Jr. as President elect.   A demand was placed upon the Chief  Justice to rescind the unlawful Oath  of  Office and declare all Government Papers sealed with Barack Obama's signature to be null and void.

A "Declaration of Sovereignty" has been written in the name of the People of the Alaska Republic.  This Declaration denounces the unconstitutional Acts of Congress that have been imposed upon the People for over one  hundred  years.  This  Declaration also denounces Barack Obama Jr. as having the Constitutional qualifications of holding the Office of President of the United States.

PDF   Email Message to the Legislators of the States  New

Elected representatives of our State Legislatures are not aware as to what has taken place over the years in Washington, D.C. that has allowed Barack Hussein Obama to make outlandish claims that he does not have to listen to the U.S. Congress or even to the U.S. Supreme Court.  Most people have no idea where the purported authority of Barack  Hussein  Obama is derived from for his claims to invade a foreign Country with the "Military" of the United States without a Congressional "Declaration of War" or as to the authority for the President and his Cabinet Staff to ignore what the "Legislatures" of the "States" perceives to be the "Powers" and "Rights" reserved to the "States."

This Email Message was received by every Legislator of the State of Alaska and Legislators of other States of the Union.  There was not a single Member of any State Legislature that came forward to take action to protect and defend our "Constitution" for the United States of America.

Over the years, members or our State Legislatures have introduced "Resolutions" against the U.S. Congress and the President of the United States for trespassing upon the "reserved powers" of the States as protected by Article X of the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution.  The only problem with these "Resolutions" is that Article X of the Bill of Rights only applies to the original thirteen States that brought the "United States" into existence under the Articles of Confederation, not to the States that were brought into the Union under "Statehood Acts" of the Congress of the United States.

This PDF File "Article" will surprise you about the powers exercised by States that were brought into the Union under "Statehood Acts" of the Congress of the United States and how those States may bring the "Representatives" of the U.S. Congress and the "Officers" of the Executive and Judicial Branches of the United States government back under the authority of the United States Constitution.

PDF   September 11th Commission Report   

The writer warrants that the information presented in this report is an accurate reflection of information presented on public news sites on the internet.  Information on these sites is sometimes presented by individuals or organizations which may be viewed as pursuing objectives which are hateful and malicious.  If information on such sites appears to have merit, and that information is consistent with other facts in the investigation, the factual information from that site is included as best possible, without any reflection on the merit of that site’s objectives.  The intent of this report is to

1) provide a hypothetical explanation for the events of September 11, 2001 that incorporates currently public information not included in the official government report, and

2) focus public attention on circumstances that strongly suggest there has been wrong doing by public officials and organizations involved in misuse of government resources,

3) explain why officials may have been motivated to mislead the American public, and

4) provide a foundation of research and hypothesis for future research. 

Information presented in this report documents that the federal institutions responsible for investigating these events are currently involved in efforts to suppress the facts under the guise of National Security.  Hence, this information is being made public in the hope that unknown Officials with appropriate level of authority can re-institute the appropriate investigation, or that private investigative resources can further substantiate (or disprove) these claims.

Alaska Candidate, Lisa Murkowski, "usurps" Office of U.S. Senator

PDF Women and non-white male citizens are not eligible for Public Offices of the United States government 

Are women and non-white men eligible to hold Public Offices of the United States?  This is a question that has never been addressed.  Herein is a Proclamation with Inquiry in the nature of "Quo Warranto" which briefs the question.

*/  The "Objection" with "Proclamation" challenging candidate Lisa Murkowski's qualifications for Office were never forwarded to the U.S. Senate for investigation.  This is another instance where Public Officials tells the People "go to hell" and that the U.S. Constitution is nothing more than a roll of Toilet Paper.  No letter of response has ever been received from the Alaska Department of Elections.

PDF    Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act   

The Democrat Party of the 111th U.S. Congress passed the "Patient protection and Affordable Health Care Act" over the objections of the Republican Party and without allowing anyone to read the Bill.  What was in the "Patient protection and Affordable Health Care Act" that the Members of the Democrat Party didn't want you to see?

          Barack Obama's Health Care Chart   

Washington, DC – Four months after U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously declared “We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it,” a Congressional panel has released the first chart illustrating the 2,801 page health care bill that President Obama signed into law. 

Developed by the Joint Economic Committee minority, led by U.S  Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas and Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, the detailed organization chart displays a bewildering array of new government agencies, regulations and mandates.

MP3   Mike Laverne interviews a Neurosurgeon   

Radio Talk Show host, Mike Laverne interviews a caller who identifies himself as a Neurosurgeon and is told that under the new National Health Care law (Obama Care), anyone over the age of seventy (70) years of age will not receive government paid neurological hospital care.

Articles by Lee Brobst

Lee Brobst wrote several articles on the law of the 14th Amendment and how it relates to the Internal Revenue Laws of the United States.  See how the 14th Amendment "Privileges" and "Immunities" Clauses effects your every day lives.

The Mondo Politico Library    [outside page link]    

The Full Text of Some of the World's Most Important Political Books, Online and Free

Here, in the Mondo Politico Library, you will find a growing collection of fiction and non-fiction books of a political nature. Mondo Politico is preparing a broad selection of political classics for your online enjoyment and will add each one as soon as it is completed.

Political Science Degree   [outside page link]

Guide to Online Political Science Degree Programs  (01/16/11)

My goal was to compile an unbiased and updated list of every school that offers a political science degree in the U.S..  I felt the existing lists were not comprehensive, easy to find, and many web sites have outdated information and links.  I spent a lot of time building a useful resource for political science students and would simply like to ask that you take a look.   [Philipe]

The Globalization of United States Domestic Land Use Policy

Congressman Don Young (R-AK) brings to us a letter exposing the United Nations World Heritage Sites and Biosphere Reserves and their effects upon private property rights and the sovereignty of the United States of America.

On January 30th, 2013  we saw George Town University
Constitutional Law Professor, Louis Seidman appearing on Fox Cable News Network declaring that the U.S. Constitution is outdated and needs to be retired.  What he did not tell is that there is a another Constitution that has been written which delegates total dictatorial powers to the Officers of the government and that this Constitution is on the sidelines to be ratified.  (see below "Constitution for the Newstates of America")

Flash Video Law Professor Louis Michael Seidman on CBS Says:
'Let's Give Up On The Constitution'
   [YouTube Video Link] 
  Law Professor Louis Michael Seidman is a Professor of Georgetown "Jesuit" University and the Catholic "Jesuits" have been at WAR with the Protestants for over three-hundred years.  It is the desire of the "Jesuits" to destroy all Protestant Churches and all Protestant Republican governments of the States.  Do you not see why 'Professor Seidman' wants to destroy our Federal Constitution?

Proposed Constitution for the Newstates of America  New

There is a need to inform entities that this New States Constitution denies most of the freedoms that you now enjoy, and while it is worded in legal terminology to give it the appearance of creating something that will diminish crime and so forth, it is also creating a police state such as the reserving of all powers now given in the New States Constitution to the police.

This need to inform indicates that this kind of phraseology as that which means everything except what is covered in this Constitution, the police then can make up any rules they want for any situation that is not covered in this document.  That there are so many similar and tricky phrases in the New States Constitution that there will be little room for anyone to move or have any rights of freedom, including freedom of speech, assembly, etc.; that it will make it almost impossible to ever escape from the domination of these laws, or to ever again gain freedoms that have been allowed under the Constitution.


Constitutional Convention - Proposed Constitution for the Newstates of America

A CONSTITUTION FOR THE NEWSTATES OF AMERICA from the book, "THE EMERGING CONSTITUTION" by Rexford G. Tugwell, published 1974 illustrates with chilling clarity the final objective of regional governance conspirators.  The goal is a corporate state concentrating economic, political and social powers in the hands of a ruling elite. "A Constitution for the Newstates of America," is the fortieth version of this revolutionary document prepared by a team of social experimenters at the "CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS," "Fund for the Republic" (Ford Foundation, Post Office Box 4068, Santa Barbara, California  93103.

The Center, its first objective accomplished, has appointed socialist - oriented University of Denver Chancellor Maurice B. Mitchell as its new head and may merge with the "
Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies," a Colorado-based world government policy promotion agency.


MS Word   Whether You Like Him Or Hate Him 

Eric is a retired Army who served as public officer at Rucker from 1989 to 1991, wrote this letter to former President, Bill Clinton.  This is a must read letter.

PDF   The Death of Common Sense 

Today we mourn the passing of an old friend, by the name of 'Common Sense'.

'Common Sense' lived a long life but died in the United States from heart failure just after the new millennium.  No one really knows how old he was, since his birth records were long ago lost in bureaucratic red tape.

Our Enemy, The State

If we look beneath the surface of our public affairs, we can discern one fundamental fact, namely: a great redistribution of power between society and the State. This is the fact that interests the student of civilization.  He has only a secondary or derived interest in matters like price-fixing, wage-fixing, inflation, political banking, "agricultural adjustment," and similar items of State policy that fill the pages of newspapers and the mouths of publicists and politicians. All these can be run up under one head. They have an immediate and temporary importance, and for this reason they monopolize public attention, but they all come to the same thing; which is, an increase of State power and a corresponding decrease of social power.

The Ongoing Police Protection Scam

The courts have decided that you have no right to expect the police to protect you from crime!  Incredible as it may seem, the courts have ruled that the police are not obligated to even respond to your calls for help, even in life threatening situations!

Myron Fagan on the Illuminati

A lot has been said about conspiracy.  Myron Fagan is an expert on the "Illuminati" and the "Council on Foreign Relations."  He has detailed the events and the players who have played a role in setting up the "New World Order."  Myron Fagan also details as to how the "United Nations" and the "Council on Foreign Relations" came into being and their role in the order of things.

The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion

The "Protocols of Zion" were referred to in the late 1700s.  The first copy available to public scrutiny surfaced in the early 1800s.  Every aspect of this plan to subjugate the world has since become reality, validating the authenticity of conspiracy.  This is an exact reprint of the original text.

pdf   Colonel Mandell House Predicts The Creation Of STRAWMAN

This is the first real evidence found that our current Social, Financial, and Legal system was deliberately designed to enslave humanity.

    Sound The Pledge Of Allegiance  [Audio Files]

Do you know the meaning of words that is found in the "Pledge Of Allegiance" for the United States of America?  A lot of debates have taken place when the judiciary of the United States declared that the words: "Under God" in the "Pledge Of Allegiance" could no longer be recited in the public schools of America.  [See the below Case of "Newdow v. Congress"].  The case of "Newdow v. Congress" was later overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The recording must be heard and the Red Skelton recording is recorded in "Adobe Flash Player" audio format.

Flash Video   The Pledge Of Allegiance   [Video Files]

Red Skeleton and John Wayne gives us their understanding of the words in the "Pledge Of Allegiance."   The videos are recorded in  "Flash" video format.  There are also other interesting "Flash" videos relating to the "Pledge Of Allegiance" at this Internet Link.

The Vision of George Washington

Did you know that George Washington was visited by an Angel and was given a vision about the future of the United States of America?  George saw three separate Wars that were to be fought on the soil of the United States.  Two of the three Wars have come to past; one is yet to come.  The vision of George Washington is catalogued in the Library of Congress.

The American Evangelist's Vision  [Outside Page Link]

PDF  The American Evangelist's Vision

An American evangelist recorded the following supernatural vision in the year 1954.  Research reveals that not only are the prophecies of this vision true to the Scriptures quoted therein, but scientific and military leaders today are aware that these things are coming to pass or are very plausible in light of modern technological advances.  The evangelist remains anonymous.

Inherent National Bankruptcy

The Federal Reserve operates a Ponzi scheme. Congress can pay for federal expenses with funds collected from taxes, imposts, and duties, but congress is never satisfied with this amount.  Jim Carter explains the Federal Reserve Bank Ponzi scheme and why it will fail.

PDF   The United States isn't a Country; it is a Corporation! 

Don’t point to that beloved parchment, the Constitution, as a symbol of your enduring freedom.  It is representative of a form of government which seemingly no longer exists in this country today.  The Constitution has been thrown out the window, the Republic shoved aside and replaced with a democracy.  The thing is; most people in this country remain unaware that this is so because they simply do not know the truth – what lies beyond the myths.

Trial by Jury

LYSANDER SPOONER tells us that for more than six hundred years - that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 - there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.  This is the full essay on Trial by Jury at common law that was written by Lysander Spooner in the year of 1852.

PDF   The Case of "Newdow v. Congress"

This is the infamous case of "Newdow v. Congress" wherein the federal judges of the United States  9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it was unconstitutional for children to recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" in public schools.

PDF   Houston Law Review  [Pledge of Allegiance] 

The "Houston Law Review" reviews the case of "Newdow v. Congress" and gives us a detailed historical overview of the "Pledge of Allegiance.

The Flag Code

Previous to "Flag Day," June 14, 1923 there were no federal or state regulations governing display of the United States Flag.  It was on this date that the "National Flag Code" was adopted by the "National Flag Conference" which was attended by representatives of the Army and Navy which had evolved their own procedures, and some 66 other national groups.  This purpose of providing clear guidance based on the Army and Navy procedures relating to display and associated questions about the U.S. Flag was adopted by all organizations in attendance.

Our Flag

Does the "First Amendment" give us the right to desecrate the American  flag?  Or  is the flag a sacred symbol of our nation, deserving protection by  law?  Tough  call?  "The  Solution" for those who want to light Old Glory on  fire, stomp  all over  it, or  spit on it to make some sort of  "statement," I  say let them do  it.  But under one  condition: they  MUST get permission from three sponsors - -

MS Word  Federalism Unmasked

Federalism Unmasked or the rights of the States, the Congress, the Executive, and the People, vindicated against the encroachments of the Judiciary, prompted by the modern apostate democracy.  Being the compilation from the writings and speeches of the leaders of the old Jeffersonian Republican Party. 

The Truth About Abraham Lincoln

The following information was derived from information that exists in the Smithsonian, National Archives, the Congressional Library, Courtroom Police files, public and private libraries and storage vaults across the United States and Europe: "Abraham Lincoln was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of the Hapsburg royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a White House reception in 1862.  The German royal family member demanded a pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln.  The blows to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to participate in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the reception room."  What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and upset the royal European personage?

Lincoln’s Spectacular Lie   [outside page link]

The cornerstone of the Lincoln Legend is a spectacular lie. As eloquently stated by former syndicated columnist James J. Kilpatrick in his 1957 book, "The Sovereign States": "The delusion that sovereignty is vested in the whole people of the United States is one of the strangest misconceptions of our public life" (p. 15).  Lincoln espoused this fable in order to make the preposterous argument that no such thing as state sovereignty ever existed; the states were never at any time free and independent of the federal government; they did not in fact create the federal government by ratifying the Constitution; and that, therefore, no group of citizens could ever secede from the federal government.

U.S.  v.  U.S.  v.  U.S.A. 

Few Americans realize that There are three definitions for the "United States."  Most have been misled to believe that the term "United States" has a single meaning and is a generic term referring to the country as a whole.  Not always so.  The legal standing of each individual American to any one of the three varies depending on his lack of status or his status in law.  If you are a citizen of the District of Columbia (the Democracy) you have privileges granted by congress -- Or, if you are a Citizen of the Union (the Republic) you are endowed with Rights -- some of which are unalienable.

U.S. versus U.S.A.   [outside page link]

Both concurrently exist today. The corporate system has been gaining predominance in the last 70 years.  Many Sovereigns have contracted with the corporate system unknowingly, unintentionally, and or without full disclosure.  Which one do you want for yourself and your posterity?  Once you know the difference, you may have to make a decision for yourself, your family, and your posterity.  That decision may require changes in how you do things.  You may have to undo what has been done and make your Sovereign status known.  This is not taught in government schools, because they do not want you to know this.  They want power and control over the masses they call "Human Resources."

Truth In Media   [outside page link]

Ever had a friend or a neighbor who waxed nostalgic about the "good old days" when "the world used to be so simple?"  Who lamented the time when media always told the truth, at least as most readers thought?  Who missed the days when patriotism, national pride or "motherhood and apple pie" weren't cynically snickered at by the "cool" liberal-globalists as old-fashioned ideas whose time has passed?  Or who just thought that "life was more fun" back then?

Well, if you're like the millions of Americans who feel that way today; who resent being ruled by the big business elites; who have lost trust in our once democratic institutions; who want to feel proud of their country again - wax nostalgic no more!  Join the readers whom Bob Djurdjevic's "Truth in Media" editorials and columns have been enchanting and often moving to action.  From business leaders to academics; from homemakers to economists; from clergymen to college students - Djurdjevic's pieces have drawn worldwide accolades and admiration.

U.S. Legal History

U.S. Law is Private Merchant Law, leaving the people as "Surety" and "Debtor" on the bankruptcy.  Law is contract, universally and in the U.S., so we must follow the progression of contractual agreements which constitute the underlying U.S. Law.  This document gives us the chronological order of contract law that leaves the citizens of the United States as the "Surety" and "Debtor" on the bankruptcy.

PDF   The Secret Of The Special Maritime Jurisdiction 

A brief dissertation exposing the true nature and cause of modern criminal accusations by Valiant Liberty.

Family Guardian   [outside page link]

The Family Guardian exists as a free public service.  Its sole focus is to strengthen, stabilize, and empower families and individuals by providing information on many subjects.  There is a lot of good reading at this web site.

Adobe PDF   Handbook of American Constitutional Law

A constitution differs from a statute or ordinary act of legislation in three important particulars: . . . .

Marijuana Ballot Initiatives


Adobe PDF   Alaska Marijuana Ballot Initiative (Epperly's Testimony in Opposition)

The "People" of the "State of Alaska" voted into "Law" the "Alaska Marijuana Ballot Initiative" (2014) and the "Alaska State Legislature" will be reviewing that "Ballot Initiative" for implementation.  Mr. Epperly gives "Testimony in Opposition" to the implementation of the "Ballot Initiative" into a "Law" for the  State of Alaska."

Adobe PDF    Alaska Marijuana Legalization -- Ballot Measure 2 - (2014)

The "People" of the "State of Alaska" approved "Ballot Measure 2" into law.  Here is the full text of that "Marijuana Ballot Measure" with "Legislative Affairs Agency Summary."

↓ — — — — — ↓

Adobe PDF  Epperly vs. State of Alaska vs. The United States of America

A "Petition for a Redress of Grievance" was filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska on April 15, 2015. The "Petition" was filed for the purpose of the Court to resolve a controversy of laws that exist with the use of "Marijuana" between the State of Alaska and The United States of America

Adobe PDF  State of Alaska's "Motion to Dismiss"

State of Alaska filed a "Motion to Dismiss" pleading "Failure to State a Claim" and "Want of Standing" for Mr. Epperly to bring his "Petition for Redress of Grievance" before the U.S. District Court.  An "Exception and Opposition" has been filed.

Adobe PDF  Epperly's "Opposition" to State of Alaska's "Motion to Dismiss"

Mr. Epperly filed an "Opposition" to the State of Alaska's "Motion to Dismiss."  Also filed was a "Motion for Summary Judgment on the Pleadings."  Mr. Epperly believes that he has destroyed the "Motion to Dismiss."

Adobe PDF 

State of Alaska's Reply To Opposition To "Motion To Dismiss," and Opposition to "Motion For Summary Judgment"

State of Alaska has submitted its reply to Mr. Epperly's Opposition to "State's Motion to Dismiss" and Opposes Epperly's "Motion for Summary Judgment."  Mr. Epperly agreed with the Opposition to the "Summary Judgment" and had the "Motion" removed from the Record of the Court.

Adobe PDF   United State's "Motion to Dismiss"

The Respondent, "The United States of America," has submitted its "Motion To Dismiss.'"  The Petitioner, Gordon Warren Epperly, has "Objected" to the "Motion."

Adobe PDF  Epperly's "Objection" to United State's "Motion to Dismiss"

The Petitioner, Gordon Warren Epperly has filed his "Objection" to The United States "Motion to Dismiss."  Does Mr. Epperly have "standing" to obtain a "Declaratory Judgment" regarding the use of "Marijuana"?

Adobe PDF  United State's Reply To Opposition To "Motion to Dismiss"

The Respondent, "The United States of America," has submitted its "Reply" to Mr. Epperly's "Opposition to 'United States Motion to Dismiss'."  Attached to the United States "Reply" is the Court Case which Attorney Richard L. Pomeroy has relied upon to show that Mr. Epperly has no "Standing" to present a "Petition for Redress of  Grievance" requesting "Declaratory Judgments."  Notwithstanding the assertion of Attorney Richard L. Pomeroy, the attached case of "Montana Environmental Information Center v. Stone-Manning, 766 F.3d 1184"  shows that Mr. Epperly has "Standing" and the pertinent parts of that case are "boxed" with sideline comments.

Adobe PDF  Motion to include text of "5 USC 701-706" & "Court Case"

The Attorney for the Respondent, "The United States of America" continues to allege that the Petitioner, Gordon Warren Epperly has no "standing" to question the policy of the U.S. Attorney General to delegate the "Powers" of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. President to regulate and execute the "Federal Control Substance Laws" on "Marijuana" to the States of the Union.  "Title 5 of the United States Code at Sections 701 thru 706" should put the question of "standing" to rest.  The Attorney for the Respondent, State of Alaska has taken the position that under the doctrine of "Federalism," the States of the Union are not subject to the "Federal Control Substance Law" as that law applies to "Marijuana."  The case of "United States of America v. Michael Carl Visman, 919 F.2d 1390" says otherwise.

Adobe PDF  Notice of Relevant Court Cases and Motion to add Cases to Record of Court

Here is a listing to Relevant Court Cases as required by Local Rule 40.2 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska.  Also this document addresses Judge Robert E. Blackburn's "Court Order To Sever" sections of the "Complaint" of "Safe Streets Alliance et al., v. Alternative Holstic Healing, LLC et al.," (see below) on grounds that the Plaintiffs most likely does not have "standing" to bring a private action into the Court declaring the "Statutes" of the State of Colorado are "null and void" as being preempted by the "Federal Control Substance Law."  This "Court Order" has been addressed within this "Motion to add additional cases into the Record of the Court."

Adobe PDF
Motions to Dismiss Petitioner's "Petition for Redress of Grievance"

On November 5th, 2015; Judge Sharon L. Gleason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska has "dismissed" Gordon Warren Epperly's "Petition for Redress of Grievance" with prejudice.  This is no surprise. The "Court Order" merely states that the Petitioner had no authority (standing) to bring forth a "Petition for Redress of Grievance" before the Court.  There are no statements made within the "Court Order" that shows the allegations of the Petitioner were not true.

COMMENT: A "Notice of Appeal" will not be filed as it would be a waste of time.  It is common knowledge that ProSe litigants have no standing before the Courts for want of paying monetary tributes to Members of the BAR.


Adobe PDF    Letter - Members of the Alaska Marijuana Board and Assemblies of City and Boroughs  New

This letter was submitted after the above case of Epperly vs. State of Alaska and The United States was dismissed for "Want of Standing" leaving the Officials of the State of Alaska Marijuana Control Board and Members of City and Boroughs standing in the front lines of damaging their fellow Citizens by issuing defacto Marijuana Building Permits and Marijuana Business Licenses which may submit themselves to civil and criminal liability.


↑ — — — — — ↑


Adobe PDF  "Court Order" - Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment DENIED New   Very Important Ruling.

In this case, the federal government charged 16 persons in a Sacramento federal court with a single charge of conspiracy to grow 1,000 or more marijuana plants between Feb 2008 and October 2011 in Trinity and Tehama counties.  1,000 plants is the magic number that makes the minimum sentence (with a couple of small exceptions) upon conviction 10 years in prison; 100 or more marijuana plants nets at least 5 years in prison.  Several of the Defendants moved the Court to dismiss the Indictment which was denied on April 17, 2015. 

Adobe PDF  (Memo) - Justice Department Announces Update to Marijuana Enforcement Policy

Adobe PDF  (Memo) - Collection of U.S. Justice Department Letters and Memos

Adobe PDF  (Memo) - BATF on Marijuana and Firearms

These are the "Memos" which several "States" have relied upon as the authority to enact laws to legalize the use of "Marijuana" within their "States."  I call your attention to the "Memo" of "U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag."  If you own a "Firearm," be sure to read the "BATF" Memo.

Adobe PDF  The Theory of Prosecutorial Discretion in Federal Law

U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder and his Deputy Attorney Generals have relied upon the "Theory of Prosecutorial Discretion" as their authority to alter and amend the "Federal Control Substance Law" and delegate the exclusive "Powers" of the "U.S. Congress" to regulate "Marijuana" under the "Interstate Commerce" clause of the "U.S. Constitution" to the States of the Union.

Adobe PDF  How The Judiciary Stole The Right To Petition

In the above Court Action of "Epperly vs. State of Alaska vs. The United States of America", Mr. Epperly brought the "Cause of Action" into the Court as a "Petition for Redress of Grievance," not as a "Complaint."  As expected, the Attorneys for the "State of Alaska" and "The United States of America" have moved the Court to dismiss the "Petition" for want of "Standing" of a "Complaint."  This "Article" on our "Right" to "Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievance" explains what is that "Common Law Right" and how (over a period of time) the Federal Judges have destroyed this provision of the U.S. Constitution.

Adobe PDF  U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee - Loretta Lynch on Marijuana 

U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, has now retired and former U.S. Attorney, Loretta Lynch, has been promoted and confirmed by the U.S. Senate to be the next U.S. Attorney General.  The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee has presented several questions to Loretta Lynch on "Marijuana."  This is a list of the questions raised and the answers given by Loretta Lynch.

Adobe PDF  Letter - Marijuana Ballot Initiatives 

Here is a letter addressed to James M. Cole as the U.S. Deputy Attorney General questioning his authority to delegate "Powers" of "The United States of America" to the "Governors" of the "States" to execute and enforce the "Marijuana Prohibition Laws and Treaties" of the government of "The United States of America."

Adobe PDF  Letter - Alaska Marijuana (Hemp) Laws 

This letter addresses Alaska Senate Bill No. 08 in establishing of a "Hemp" culture within the State of Alaska.  Attached to this letter is a paper addressing that failure of the "Hemp" industry of the State of North Dakota for being in conflict with the "Federal Control Substance Acts."

Adobe PDF  Letter - Marijuana - The Assurances of the State

This is an e-mail message addressed to the members of the "Alaska State Legislature."  The message advises the "Legislators" that they have a duty to assure its "Citizens" of the safety to use "Marijuana" for "Human Consuption," and as the "U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency" has put everyone on "Notice" through the "Federal Register" that "Marijuana" has no use for medical purposes and it is a dangerous drug that should never be used for any purpose whatsoever, the "Marijuana Ballot Inititives" places every "State" in a state of liability for "Tort" action.

Adobe PDF  Letter (1) - Liability of Public Officials authorizing Marijuana Pot Shops New

Most of our Officials of the Municipal governments have no idea that the enacting of "Ordnances" and issuing "Permits," "Licenses," and other "Documents" to allow "Marijuana Pot Shops" to be established in their Cities are placing themselves in jeopardy of being charged with "Federal Crimes."  This letter explains the problem.

Adobe PDF  Letter (2) - Liability of Public Officials authorizing Marijuana Pot Shops New

This is a letter addressed to the members of the "Assembly" for the "City and Borough of Juneau" (Alaska) as a follow up to the first letter giving "notice of liability" of being arrested and prosecuted for violating the laws of the "United States."  This letter was accompanied with a "Memo" from "U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag" explaining the "Policies" of the "U.S. Justice Department" in regard to the "States" authorizing the use of "Marijuana."

Adobe PDF  Letter - U.S. Attorney,  Sally Amanda Marshall

This letter informs "U.S. Attorney, Sally Amanda Marshall" of her "errors" in reporting within the "Newspapers" of our "Nation" that "Native Indians" of "Indian Reservations" may use "Marijuana" for recreational and medical purposes.

Adobe PDF  Letter - U.S. Representative, Trent Franks 

This letter addresses an "Associated Press" (AP) Article  as published in the Newspapers of our Nation wherein it was reported that several members of Congress are considering introducing legislation to discourage the States from legalizing the use of Marijuana.  U.S. Rep. Trent Franks is one of those who would like to sponsor such legislation.

Adobe PDF  Letter -  Executive Offices for United States Attorneys

This letter was mailed in obligation to report crimes that are cognizant to the Federal Courts under the mandate of 18 USC 4, "Misprision of felony."  This letter reports "Deputy Attorney General, James M. Cole" as committing the crime of "aiding" and "abetting" the commission of crimes against the "Laws" of the "United States."

Adobe PDF  Letter - Emergency Action To Be Taken 

This letter addresses the need to adopt "emergency legislation" directed at the "Governor" and "Attorney General" for the "State of Alaska" to declare the "Alaska Marijuana Ballot Initiative" to "null and "void" for being in conflict with the "Federal Controlled Substance Acts" and thus being unconstitutional.

Adobe PDF Flash Video  Letter - Alaska State Legislature  [Video Files] 

This letter addresses the "supremacy" of the laws of "U.S. Congress" to regulate "Marijuana" as a commodity that moves through commerce under the "Interstate Commerce Clause" of the "U.S. Constitution."  This "PDF Document" has several "Video Links" to videos on the use of "Marijuana" within the "States."

Adobe PDF  Letter - The Exclusive Power of Congress Over Interstate Commerce  

This letter to the "Alaska State Legislature" addresses the "Power" of "Congress" to regulate "Marijuana" under the "Interstate Commerce Clause" of the "U.S. Constitution"

Adobe PDF  Letter - AICPA issues "Brief" on impact of Marijuana Laws  

This letter to the "Alaska State Legislature" introduces a “Brief” by “AICPA” (Certified Public Accountants) giving them a study of the “Marijuana Laws” as adopted by the “State of Colorado” and the “State of Washington” and its impact upon the “Banks” and “Businesses” of those “States.”   This “Brief” was updated January 5, 2015.

Adobe PDF  Letter - Alaska State Legislature - (01-31-15) 

This letter to the "Alaska State Legislature" addresses issues that have been overlooked in regard to the legalization of the use of "Marijuana."  The legalization of "Marijuana" may jeopardize the "World Tourist Industry" of the "State" by violating the laws that govern "Cruise Ships" and other issues.

Adobe PDF  Letter - Alaska State Legislature - (02-02-15)  

This letter to the “Alaska State Legislature” address misconceptions and errors that were made in the “Joint House and Senate Judiciary Committee” of January 20th, 2015.  This letter presents undisputable evidence that the “Alaska Marijuana Ballot Initiative” of year 2014 is unconstitutional, null and void.

Adobe PDF  Letter - Alaska State Legislature - (02-12-15) 

This letter addresses Congressional "H.R 1523" of April 12 2013 wherein several "Congressman" tried to remove "Marijuana" from the penalty section of the "Federal Control Substance Law" for those that are in compliance with the "Marijuana Laws" of a "State."  The "House Resolution" never was acted upon in "Committees."

Adobe PDF  Letter - Alaska State Legislature - (02-15-15)  

This letter addresses "International Drug Treaties" and other issues.  This letter puts the "Alaska Legislature" and "Attorney General" on notice that there is a "controversy" with the "State of Alaska" and "The United States of America" in regulating "Marijuana" that will have to be addressed and resolved by a "Federal Judge."   


↓ — — — — — ↓


Adobe PDF  Petition to Reschedule Cannabis (Marijuana)  

This "Petition to Reschedule Cannabis" was filed by "The Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis" with the "Federal Drug Enforcement Agency" (DEA) in an attempt to remove "Marijuana" from the "Schedule I" classification of being a dangerous drug that shall not be used for any purpose.

Adobe PDF  Federal Register -- CRC Petitions, DEA Answers  

"The Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis" Petition to reschedule the "Federal Controlled Substance Law" from the "Schedule I" classification.  This "Report" is very detailed as to why the "Petition" was denied.

Adobe PDF  Federal Courts Rejects Legalizing Medical Marijuana

Here are three "Articles" reporting on the "U.S.  Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia" rejecting a lawsuit to order "DEA" to reconsider its ruling denying reclassification of "Marijuana" from a "Schedule I

Adobe PDF  CRC Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Here is the full text of "The Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis" Petition for "Writ of Certiorari" which was filed with the "U.S. Supreme Court."  The "Petition" was denied by the "Court."


↑ — — — — — ↑


Adobe PDF  The United States of America "Patents" Marijuana

Did you know that "Marijuana" has been "Patented" and the assignee of the "Patent" is "The United States of America Department of Health and Social Services."  If "Marijuana" is "Patented," the question is raised:  "By what authority does any "State" of the "Union" authorize the "farming," "distribution," and "sale" of "Marijuana" to anyone other than the one who holds the "Patent" on "Marijuana" ???   Here is the full text of the "Patent."

Adobe PDF  U.N. Schedules of the Convent on Psychotropic Substances of 1971

Several "Nations" of the "United Nations" entered into "Treaties" identifying "Marijuana" as a "Psychotropic Substance" to which the party "Nations" shall not declared "lawful" for any use whatsoever.  The government of "The United States of America" is a party to those "Treaties ."


↓ — — — — — ↓


Adobe PDF  U.S. Supreme Court - Nebraska and Oklahoma vs. Colorado - (Brief of Complaint)  New

The States of Oklahoma and Nebraska moves the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to sue the State of Colorado for allowing "Marijuana" to be imported into their States.  This appears to be a "nuisance" lawsuit to prevent the State of Colorado from violating the Federal Controlled Substance Law.  This litigation was filed in December of 2014.

Adobe PDF  U.S. Supreme Court - Amici Curiae Brief - Former DEA Administrators  New

The States of Oklahoma and Nebraska motioned the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to sue the State of Colorado for allowing "Marijuana" to be imported into their States.  Former DEA Administrators have filed an "Amici Curiae Brief" in support of the States of Oklahoma and Nebraska to sue the State of Colorado.

Adobe PDF  U.S. Supreme Court - Amici Curiae Brief - States of Oregon and Washington  New

States of Oklahoma and Nebraska motioned the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to sue the State of Colorado for allowing "Marijuana" to be imported into their States.  The States of Oregon and Washington have filed an "Amici Curiae Brief" in support of the State of Colorado to dismiss the lawsuit.

Adobe PDF  U.S. Supreme Court - Nebraska and Oklahoma vs. Colorado - (Brief of Opposition) New

The State of Colorado has answered the States of Oklahoma and Nebraska "Leave to file a Complaint" with a "Brief in Opposition."

Adobe PDF  U.S. Supreme Court - Nebraska and Oklahoma vs. Colorado - (Reply Brief)  New

The States of Oklahoma and Nebraska has filed their "Reply Brief" in answer to the State of Colorado's "Brief in Opposition."

Adobe PDF  Fear and Loathing in Colorado - Invoking the Supreme Court State-Controversy Jurisdiciton

The States of Oklahoma and Nebraska has moved the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to sue the State of Colorado for allowing "Marijuana" to be imported into their States.  This paper goes into a detailed discussion on the theory of "nuisance" litigations between the States.


More Lawsuits Against State of Colorado

Adobe PDF  Brandon Coats vs. Dish Network, L.L.C.  

The “Marijuana Ballot Initiative” of the State of Colorado was worded almost identical to the “’Marijuana Ballot Initiative No. 2’ (2014)” of the State of Alaska and other States of the Union.  In these “Ballot Initiatives,” the Sponsors used the word “lawful” throughout.  As the use of the word “lawful” is identical to each of those “Marijuana Ballot Initiatives,” the definition of that word “lawful” as given by the June 15, 2015 Colorado State Supreme Court must be given to the word “lawful” as used within those “Ballot Initiatives" of all States:

“Coats contends that the General Assembly intended the term “lawful” here to mean “lawful under Colorado state law,” which, he asserts, recognizes medical marijuana use as “lawful.”  Coats, Ά 6, 303 P.3d at 149.  "We do not read the term “lawful” to be so restrictive. …"

“The CSA lists marijuana as a Schedule I substance, meaning federal law designates it as having no medical accepted use, a high risk of abuse, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision.  Id. at § 812(b)(1)(A)–(C).  This makes the use, possession, or manufacture of marijuana a federal criminal offense, except where used for federally-approved research projects.  Id. at § 844(a); see also Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 14 (2005).  There is no exception for marijuana use for medicinal purposes, or for marijuana use conducted in accordance with state law.  21 U.S.C. § 844(a); see also Gonzales, 545 U.S.at 29 (finding that “[t]he Supremacy Clause unambiguously provides that if there is any conflict between federal and state law, federal law shall prevail,” including in the area of marijuana regulation).  Coats’s use of medical marijuana was unlawful under federal law and thus not protected by [Colorado State Law] section 24‑34‑402.5.”

As the laws of the government of "The United States of America" makes unlawful the use of "Marijuana," the use of "Marijuana" is also unlawful in all States.

Adobe PDF  Sheriffs Sues State of Colorado over Legal Marijuana  

Several Sheriffs for the "State of Colorado" have brought a lawsuit into the "U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado" stating that they have been damaged from the negligence of the Governor exceeding his authority in allowing the "Colorado Marijuana Ballot Initiative" to go into effect when the Governor and his Attorney General had full knowledge that the "Ballot Initiative" was "unconstitutional" for being in conflict with the "Federal Controlled Substance Act."

Adobe PDF  Safe Streets Alliance & New Vision Hotels et.al., vs. Summit Marijuana, et.al.,  

Safe Streets joined with "New Vision Hotels Two, LLC," which owns the Holiday Inn in Frisco, Colorado to sue a handful of members of the marijuana industry on racketeering charges. New vision “is suffering injuries to its business and property caused by the operations of Summit Marijuana, a state-licensed recreational marijuana store that plans to open less than 75 yards from the front entrance of New Vision’s hotel.”  / +++

Adobe PDF  Phillis Windy Hope Reilly, et.al., vs. Governor John W. Hickenlooper, Jr., et.al.,
               Court Order Dismissing Parties
               Court Order Granting Motions To Sever

The Reillys are Colorado property owners who have been injured by a conspiracy to cultivate recreational marijuana near their land, and they are members of Safe Streets.  Plaintiffs seek redress under RICO, which requires those who engage in racketeering activity — including the commercial production of marijuana — to pay those they injure treble damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees.   / +++

 / +++  Comment:  It appears that the above cases were prematurely filed for they assert damages from a business that does not exist.  It is difficult to imagine that the Plaintiffs have established damages to warrant "Standing" before a Federal Court.

Adobe PDF  Marijuana - Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30 2015

U.S. Congressional Representative, "Donna Christensen" D-VI inserted deep within the year 2015 "Appropriation Bill" a provision to withhold funds from the "U.S. Justice Department" to enforce the "Federal Controlled Substance Law" as that "Law" applies to "Marijuana" as used by those "States" that have adopted medical Marijuana laws.  Also included is the "State of Colorado" response to the "Oklahoma" and "Nebraska" lawsuit.

Adobe PDF  Federal Courts Rejects Legalizing Medical Marijuana (1)

Here is the full text of the case "UNITED STATES vs. OAKLAND CANNABIS BUYERS' COOPERATIVE and JEFFREY JONES, 532 U.S. ___ (2001)" wherein the Court declared that "The Controlled Substances Act, 84 Stat. 1242, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq., prohibits the manufacture and distribution of various drugs, including marijuana.  In this case, we must decide whether there is a medical necessity exception to these prohibitions.  We hold that there is not."   U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas.

Adobe PDF  Federal Courts Rejects Legalizing Medical Marijuana (2)
Adobe PDF  Gonzales v. Raich -- (Brief for the Petitioners) - (2004)
 U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments  U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Here is the full text and Oral Argments of the case "GONAZLES vs. RAICH, (03-1454) - 545 U.S. 1 (2005)" giving us a detailed history of the regulation of "Marijuana" and the "Power" of the "U.S. Congress" to regulate "Marijuana" under the "Commerce Clause" of the "Constitution" for "The United States of America."  This "Power" extends to the individual citizens of the "States" and declared that it is a crime for anyone to have any amount of "Marijuana" in their possession.

Adobe PDF Federal Courts Rejects Legalizing Medical Marijuana (3)

Here is an "Article" reporting on the "U.S.  Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit" rejecting a lawsuit to legalize "Medical Marijuana" with the full text of the "Court Opinion."

Adobe PDF Federal Judge Says "No" To Washington Family's Medical Marijuana Defense

Here is an "Article" reporting that "State Laws" authorizing the use of "Medical Marijuana" will not keep you out of "Federal Prison."  "State Laws" will not override "Federal Laws."

Adobe PDF   Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars 

This "Top Secret" publication marks the 25th anniversary of the Third World War, called the "Quiet War," being conducted using subjective biological warfare, fought with "silent weapons."

This book contains an introductory description of this war, its strategies, and its weaponry.

Avalon Project at Yale Law School    [outside page link]

Statement of Purpose - The "Avalon Project" will mount digital documents relevant to the fields of Law, History, Economics, Politics, Diplomacy and Government.  We do not intend to mount only static text but rather to add value to the text by linking to supporting documents expressly referred to in the body of the text.  We also intend to use hypertext means of annotating and indexing the texts.  The "Avalon Project" will no doubt contain controversial documents.  Their inclusion does not indicate endorsement of their contents nor sympathy with the ideology, doctrines, or means employed by their authors.  They are included for balance, and because in some cases they are by our definition, a supporting document.


U.S. Government and Politics Resources on the Internet    [outside page link]

The "Department of Politics" at the "University of Keele" has provided an excellent page of Internet Links and Research Sources.  This is the one of best Research Sources that we have been able to locate.


The National Political Index    [outside page link]

"The National Political Index" is a web site which provides an index of substantive political information for voters, political activists, political consultants, lobbyists, politicians, academicians, and media editors with a wide range of products, information, services, simulations, games, and polling in an interactive communications environment.







Revised: November 25, 2015

Free Visitor Counters