There is a movement afoot in
this country today that is made up of disaffected and often dispossessed
Americans who are seeking a better way through a wholesale return to
their view of the past. This movement has been called many things:
the antigovernment movement, the sovereignty movement, and the
common law courts movement. Regardless of the name attached
to the beliefs and the people who follow them, one common denominator
exists: a feeling of despair, rooted in personal and pecuniary
loss, and manifested in a new, defiant mistrust and spite for the ways
of the current government. This guide focuses on the ways in which
followers of these movements impact the operation of our
state court systems.
The purpose of this booklet is to
revive, as Jefferson put it, “The Ancient Principles.”
It is not
to promote lawlessness or a return to the jungle. The “Ancient Principles”
refer to the Ten Commandments
and the Common Law. The Common Law is, in simple terms,
just plain common
sense and has its roots in the Ten Commandments.
A lusty, gusty attack on "The Law"
as a curious, antiquated institution which, through outworn procedures,
technical jargon and queer mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to
dominate our social and political lives and our business, to their
Do you know what
three things a judge has to do before he can acquire
jurisdiction over you? Do you know what you can do to
prevent the courts from acquiring jurisdiction?
This recording will give you the answers to these questions.
This recording is presented in "Adobe
Flash Player" format and the file is very large.
If you would like to save a recording, the only thing you can do is
plug an audio recorder into you computer's external speaker output -
Plea in Abatements respond to the
majority of imperial powers paperwork - head on.
When written and served properly, they have been very
successful at stopping imperial suits - before they get started.
Plea in Abatements have the force
and effect of an indictment and/or a civil case or suit. When a
Defendant does not answer a Plea in Abatement, a Default (properly
written and served) becomes Res Judicata, (i.e., final judgment has been made.).
When properly served with Default, they are a Public Record
of wrong doing, and as such, can be used by the
abating Demandant (the onewho serves the
in further actions against imperial powers fiduciaries (agents, bureaucrats,
judges, etc.), such as Trespass on Case.
In order for any contract to be valid, there must be 'full disclosure,' 'good faith,' 'valuable consideration,' and 'clean hands.' Here is what the banks advertise: "Come to our bank. We have money to loan." Is this really what happens?
you entered into a loan contract with a bank, you signed a note or
contract promising to pay the bank back, and you agreed to provide
collateral that the bank could seize if you did not repay
the loan. This contract supposedly qualified you to receive
the bank's money. But did the bank provide 'full disclosure'
of all of the terms of this agreement? Read and decide for
yourself if the bank was acting in 'good faith', that you
received 'valuable consideration', and that your 'signature'
on that agreement is valid.
Court rules against Banks
in pivotal mortgage case. The highest
Court in Massachusetts ruled against U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo & Co. Friday (01/07/11) in a widely watched mortgage foreclosure case
that could have serious implications for the Nation's largest Banks.
National law is more a moral
than a legal science. Law is a rule of action prescribed
by competent authority. Moreover, all Law implies some sanction
to enforce it. Now National law is that which defines and regulates the
social duties of Nation to Nation. Where then is the authority that
prescribes such duties, and where the sanction that enforces them? To find these we must go back to the individual Man, and see whether such duties appertain to him; by
what authority, and with what sanctions.
is an Internet website that has many interesting Articles which I would
like to encourage you to visit. This Article of Admiralty Law is
very well written and it explains why we no longer own our home or have
any Courts of Law that is founded upon the Common Law. This is a
must read Article.
This is a very interesting transcript of an
interview with an employee of a State Marriage
License Bureau. This conversation exposes the
Marriage License as a Contract that cannot be broken with
the State and grants the State absolute authority over your
family and your property.
The commercial lien, which is
authorized both by the common law and by Title 15 of
the United States Code (USC), is reportedly the
same lien the IRS uses to take Americans' homes
and cars. However, some pro se litigants do not depend
upon Title 15, but upon the common law of
negotiable instruments (a.k.a. Commercial Law).
As such, it's almost impossible
to remove a commercial lien without the approval of the individual
claimant who filed the lien. Although a commercial lien
can be challenged by a court at common law or by a
7th Amendment jury trial, it does not require a
court process or a court judgment for its establishment, validity,
or execution. Therefore, it appears that the courts may not
be able to simply extinguish this lien on their own discretion (or on
motion from the lien debtors) without the voluntary approval of
the person who filed the lien.
Traditionally, these liens can
only be removed by the voluntary decision of the person who filed
the lien, by the decision of a constitutional jury trial
at common law, or by waiting 99 or 100 years. Since
the common law has been smothered in the U.S.A.,
all judges are essentially powerless to overcome the liens.
Many people are involved in
diligent research concerning the use of all capital letters for
proper names, e.g., JOHN PAUL JONES as a substitute
for John Paul Jones in all court documents,
driver's licenses, bank accounts,
birth certificates, etc..Is the use of all capital letters to designate
a name some special English grammar rule or style?Is it a contemporary American style of English?Is the use of this form of capitalization recognized by
educational authorities?Is this
an official judicial or U.S. government rule and/or style
of grammar?Why do attorneys, court clerks, prosecutors judges,
insurance companies, banks, credit card companies,
utility companies, etc. always use all capital letters
when writing a proper name?
is a slightly condensed, casually paraphrased transcript of tapes of a
seminar given in 1990 by Howard Freeman. It was
prepared to make available the knowledge and experience of
Mr. Freeman in his search for an accessible and understandable
explanation of the confusing state of the government and
the courts. It should be helpful to those who may have
difficulty learning from such lectures, or those who want to develop a
deeper understanding of this information without having to listen
to three or four hours of recorded material.
Here is a Power Page
that is loaded with information. Mrs. Devvy Kidd
has been a guest on more than 1,000 radio shows and countless
personal speaking appearances. Devvy ran for Congress
in 1994 & 1996. She has a 90-minute video
titled, "What Congress and the Media Won't Tell You."
Mrs. Devvy Kidd is also the author of four other
published books dealing with construction financing and
In the U.S., they're
collectively called everything from "attorney" to "lawyer"
to "counselor." Are these terms truly
equivalent, or has the identity of one been mistaken
for another? What exactly is a "Licensed BAR Attorney?"
This credential accompanies every legal paper produced
by attorneys - along with a State Bar
License number. As we are about to show you,
an "attorney" is not a "lawyer,"
yet the average American improperly interchanges these words as if
they represent the same occupation, and the
average American attorney unduly accepts the honor to be
called "lawyer" when he
SPOONER tells us that for more than six
hundred years - that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 - there has been no
clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that,
in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge
what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of
the accused; but that it is also their
right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of
the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion,
unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or
resisting the execution of, such laws. This is
the full essay on Trial by Jury at common law that
was written by Lysander Spooner in the year of 1852.
The United States government became
the conqueror and all states in the Union were thus reformed as
Franchisees of the Federal Corporation. The key to when the states
became Federal Franchisees is related to the date when such states
enacted the Field Code in law.
Law Firm (Criminal Defense Practice) brings us an overview
of the U.S. Constitution, the
Bill of Rights, and "Rulings" of the
U.S. Supreme Court. What is helpful are the several Internet Links
that Aizman Law Firm provides to further
our understanding of the Laws of the United States and the
trade is deceit. There
is a difference between 'lawful' and 'legal'.
the 'spirit of the law' and is embodied in the moral
and ethical consideration of rendering unto each man his due.
"Legal" is the 'form of
the law' and merely means that it is written down someplace.It is quite possible for something to
be "legal" and still be
totally unlawful. This is a excellent study of the
present day courts of the United States.
Judge Black submits a
Legal Opinion declaring that the use of the military upon any of
the States of the Union exceeds the Constitutional authority of the
President of the United States. For to bring the military of
the United States against a State is to expel that State from the
is the infamous case of Newdow v. Congress wherein the federal
judges of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court
of Appeals ruled that it was unconstitutional for children to
recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" in
Robber baron is defined in
Webster’s as an American capitalist of the latter part of
the 19th century who became wealthy through exploitation
(as of natural resources, governmental influence, or low wage
scales).Today we have
a new class of these robber barons which are called "corporations."
A corporation is a
legal fiction; it doesn’t exist.Yes, it exists materially, but it is enshrouded in a
blanket of deceit called “corporate veil.”The “United States” is a corporation for
remuneration (for profit), and so are all
the States, federal and otherwise, and all of their counties,
parishes, cities, towns, and other subdivisions.Under the Clearfield Doctrine, derived from
the 1943 Supreme Court Decision in Clearfield Trust, et al. vs.
United States, (328 U.S. 363, 318),
the court ruled, in essence, that when a government reduces
itself to a corporate status, it becomes merely another
corporation, having no more nor less standing than all other
town in which we live, shop, and support, therefore, belongs to we the
people materially, but we are “governed” by the
new breed or robber baron as defined above.
We are living in a period of
time where nearly everyone in the world has been assigned
a number. Every Nation that has a national debt is
required by their multinational creditors to track
taxpayers' income. As you will soon find out,
treaties with multinational authorities require the United States
and other governments to issue Social Security numbers.
This treatise is well documented, not only from the
perspective of the Holy Bible, but by the laws and
court cases of the United States. Be sure to study
the "Appendixes" for the law as it applies to the
An Attorney, representing
employees of an IRS Regional Office, writes a Treatise
regarding the taxing of wages, salaries, and first time
commissions. This attorney provides you with defenses,
law origin and authorities, how to handle
a jury trial, how to handle your own defense,
discussion of law, unacceptable defenses, tax evasion and
willful failure to file issues. This is a must read
concurrently exist today. The corporate system has been gaining
predominance in the last 70 years. Many Sovereigns have
contracted with the corporate system unknowingly, unintentionally, and
or without full disclosure. Which one do you want for yourself and
your posterity? Once you know the difference, you may have to
make a decision for yourself, your family, and your posterity.
That decision may require changes in how you do things.
You may have to undo what has been done and make your Sovereign
status known. This is not taught in government schools,
because they do not want you to know this. They want power
and control over the masses they call "Human Resources."
George Mercier introduces
us to the "Invisible Contracts" that connect us to
the Internal Revenue Laws of the United States.
This is a very intense study of "Contract Law"
that everyone needs to study, especially if you decide
that the Internal Revenue Laws don't apply to you. To return
to this menu page, use your web browser "Back " button.
Many people have had their
private property classified as "Wetlands" by the
U.S. Department of Environmental Protection Agency.
Under such a classification, you cannot develop your property
without going through years of permit applications
and concessions. Enclosed is a "legal brief"
challenging the government's authority to regulate
private property within the State of Alaska
An individual was given a traffic
citation for driving a car without a driver license. He wrote a letter to the Court challenging jurisdiction and followed up the letter with his
appearance in the Courtroom. He did not cross the "Bar"
(railing seperating the audience from the judge's bench) nor did he sit at the Defendant's table, but standing
within the audience,
he informed the Judge that the Court had no jurisdiction over him and he
was waiting for a written letter stating Court's
asserted jurisdictional authority and then he walked out of the Courtroom.
Several years have passed since his visit to the Court and he is still driving without a driver license.
His identity has been removed from the letter for privacy
Anytime the use of U.S. Armed Forces
in support of civil authorities is considered, government and military
leaders, pundits, and citizens reflexively turn to the
Posse Comitatus Act for guidance. Since 9/11, the U.S. Armed Forces
face an increased likelihood that they will be called on to participate
in actions typically viewed as civil matters. Many have also
called for an increased role for the U.S. Armed Forces in responding to
natural disasters. Though many constitutional provisions, laws,
and legal rulings govern this question, in the minds of many, the
Posse Comitatus Act has prominence. Most individuals think they
know what the Posse Comitatus Act allows and disallows; most of them are
Do you own a gun? Did you
register it? Are the Gun Registration Laws in the
United States patterned after the Nazi Gun Laws of
the 1930's? Enclosed are two Articles on
Nazi Gun Control Laws as they are applied to the
Have you ever wondered why Congress wants to take away your firearms? Go to your local
law library and ask the librarian to show you where the books for the United States Code are shelved.
There are 25 books in the set and they are reddish-brown in color. Within Volume Nine you will find the answer in P.L. 87-297.
The briefs and other
legal materials which you find here are those which cover subjects
which Attorney Larry Becraft believe are of interest to
the concerned American. In reference to the "federal jurisdiction"
materials, Mr. Becraft first read tons of cases dealing
with the issue and then compiled summaries of them;
from that, Mr. Becraft composed the brief
utilizing only a small number of the researched cases.
The money issue is one of his favorites, and he drafted
the brief which appears here back in the early 80's.
The brief regarding Fifth Amendment protection for
personal financial records has its origins back in the early 80's
and over time, whenever he ran across a case which should
be included, he simply inserted the cite.
The remaining briefs cover several different topics.
Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae,
"Government As Parent," as a result of
the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States of America
in 1930, all the assets of the American people,
their person, and of our country itself are held by the Depository Trust Corporation
at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured by UCC Commercial Liens,
which are then monetized as "debt money" by the
Federal Reserve. It may interest you to know that under
the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies
the Federal Reserve Corporation and the American Bar Association,
the legal arm of the banking interests.
Part 1. COURT PROCEDURE/ DUE
PROCESS The methodology used by the
federal courts and the Department of Justice to prevent any legal
challenge to the income tax from being brought before the court in
income tax cases is presented. The method, in violation of our most
basic constitutional right, has consistently been held to void any claim
of jurisdiction in cases where the plaintiff is other than the Internal
LIBERTY---THE RIGHT TO MAKE A LIVING
A citizen's Right to Liberty secured by the Constitution has been
repeatedly adjudicated to include the right to pursue a livelihood, and
such fundamental constitutional rights are not suitable objects for
SPRINGER, POLLOCK, 16th AMENDMENT
The three items consistently claimed to adjudicate/authorize a tax on
wages and salaries are reviewed and it is concluded they have been
misrepresented for decades in what appears to be blatant fraud. The
income tax imposed on an individual's wages or salary is a bald faced
sham without any claim to acceptable legal adjudication.
MOTION TO DISMISS §7203 INDICTMENT
A generic motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action in a
willful failure to file case is based on the legal issues in Part 1.
Reference books are identified for edification.
HABEAS CORPUS/ CORUM NOBIS The
motion in Part 4
is reworked and expanded into an academic post conviction relief for a
willful failure to file conviction. Reference material and procedural
guidelines are offered.
Part 6. CORAM
NOBIS Is there any way to
challenge a conviction on a willful failure to file charge after
completion of sentence to remove probation requirements/restrictions,
eliminate payment of court imposed fines, restore voting rights and
gun ownership, remove a public stigma, improve employment and
credit potential, etc.? Using the legal issues of Part 1
and the analysis of Parts 4
the answer appears to be ‘Yes’ and without any
filing fee involved.