FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF SLAVES

Can you be a slave and not know it? I'll give you a few hints:

• Compton's Encyclopedia article Slavery and Serfdom: "Other forms of servitude related to slavery, and sometimes indistinguishable from it, are serfdom, debt bondage, indentured service, peonage, and corvee (statute labor)." 

• Elwell Evangelical Dictionary: "Roman laws were passed to protect slaves and to allow rights, even of private possessions ..."

• Civil Rights Lawyer, Gerry Spence: "People have not yet discovered they have been disenfranchised. Even lawyers can't stand to admit it."

• Clark's Summary of American Law index entry for "Employees" is "see Master and Servant" 

• When there were seven years of famine under Pharaoh, people who wanted to live sold all their land, their cattle and all their possessions to Pharaoh in exchange for food. The next year they had nothing, so they sold themselves into slavery. In Genesis 47:23-26 SLAVES OWNED BY PHARAOH HAD A 20% INCOME TAX and were allowed to keep 80%. IF YOU PAY MORE THAN 20% TAX, THEN YOU ARE WORSE OFF THAN A SLAVE. Today's expenditure of federal, state and local governments is 50% of the gross national product. If you think you are below the 50% tax bracket, you didn't add all the hidden taxes and your share of the increase in the national debt.

Notice that from the Compton's Encyclopedia article cited above, debt bondage is sometimes indistinguishable from slavery. I have an honest question. At what point did you agree to pay your share of the National Debt?

The writers of your Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, delegated to their servants the authority to borrow money; therefore they were liable for the debts that their servants incurred on their behalf. They knew that they owed the debt and that their property was the collateral. At what point did you become liable for your share? Was it by being born? Was it by registering to vote? By voluntarily paying a tax? Or was it by agreeing to be a ward on the federal plantation? Your share of the National Debt is now $73,000 per family. This is far more than the net worth of all private property. How do you intend to pay this obligation? Answer: You agreed that you are the collateral! The Social Security Act, Section 801 makes you liable for Social Security Tax and other taxes.

Before I continue, you need to understand some basics about what government is, what a republic is and what an all capitalized "PERSON" is. Satan has a counterfeit authority for you to obey. Your legitimate government went bankrupt in 1933, and was substituted with a multinational bankruptcy receivership. Details are covered in depth elsewhere. Here are the basics: 
 

Perhaps you now have a hint that you voluntarily subjected yourself to (are under a legal incapacity to) foreign creditors.

Now, imagine a legal system so diabolical that:

• A doctor, by signing a birth certificate, pledges the future earnings of the baby as collateral for the national debt. This is also a financing statement pursuant to UCC 9-302. 

• A couple, by getting a marriage certificate from their owner, agree that their vows to the state god can be cancelled by their owner's divorce court, and agree that their babies belong to their owner. 

• Only the all capitalized names that you see on government IDs can open a bank account or drive or cash a check or pay a utility bill or travel by airline. On the other hand, only the all capitalized name can be accused of a crime, or pay a tax or be drafted.

• Where people could cancel the obligations of their contracts (bankruptcy).

• Where "your" assets are returned to their rightful owner upon death, by probate.

• Where the payment of a tax not owed creates an obligation to make future payments. 

• Where the US Supreme Court in US v. Kozminski, 487 US 931, has recently confirmed that it is perfectly lawful to hold slaves to unpaid forced labor by the use of psychological coercion, threatened physical force, or threatened legal process. Because it is voluntary.

• Where the Supreme Court determined in Briscoe v. Lahue that police cannot be punished for giving perjured testimony that convicts someone.

• Where the head of the Harvard Law School, Alan Dershowitz, testifies to Congress that there is overwhelming evidence that police and prosecutors perjure themselves regularly in order to convict the innocent.

• Where "Federal prosecutors were clearly entitled to immunity for initiating prosecution, whether or not charges were false, and whether or not prosecutors knew charges were false ..." (Martinez v. Winner, 771 F2d 424).

• Where "Judicial immunity is not waived even though actions on part of judge were grievously erroneous or prompted by malice or corruption" (Patterson v. Aiken, 628 FSupp 1068).

• Where "Judge is immune from civil damage suits ... immunity extends even to malicious or corrupt acts." (Bryant v. O'Connor, 671 FSupp 1279).

• Where "Absolute immunity shelters prosecutors even when they act maliciously, wantonly, or negligently." (Rykers v. Alford, 832 F2d 895).

• Where the Supreme Court in 1972 Mitchum v. Foster, 407 US 225, 242 ruled that a citizen injured by a government officer and seeking injunctive relief needed an act of Congress. 

(Aside: I can go on and on, but you get the picture. Your servants are now out of your control. We have gone from a nation that must punish corrupt officials, to one that must not punish corrupt officials. In fact, up until the early 1900's there was a judicial doctrine that "Unclean hands shall never touch the pure fountain of justice." As for myself, the troublesome part is where the Hebrew word "gods" that is in the first commandment "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me." refers to judges or magistrates. I'm beginning to think that legitimate government is the restrainer in 2nd Thessalonians 2:7 that has been taken out of the way. This might just reveal ourselves to be the man of lawlessness. The word "man" in the phrase "man of lawlessness" is the Greek "anthropos," from which we get our word anthropology, meaning mankind. It is not the Greek word "aner" which is used for an individual.) 

ATTORNEYS ARE NOT LAWYERS. An attorney is one who entraps slaves for his master. An attorney has the duty to turn your allegiance over to his lord. The word attorney comes from the word "attornment" which means to twist (no surprise here) or to turn over. This originally referred to the transfer of feudal land where the attorney is hired to make sure that all serfs turn over to the new owner and none were freed. This is the same today. Again: Ownership of slaves remains with us today. Later, I will prove that you have already been turned over to the new owners of the federal government.

Oxford English Dictionary 1999, ATTORN: "Turn over to another; transfer, assign ... Transfer one's tenancy or ... homage or allegiance to another; formally acknowledge such transfer."

Webster's 1828 Dictionary: ATTORNMENT: "The act of a feudatory, vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of an estate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service."

Your government has distinct definitions for different categories of people. Example: The US Supreme Court in Logan v. US, 12 SCt 617, 626: "... it was decided that the word `citizen' .... was used in its political sense, and not as synonymous with `resident', `inhabitant', or `person' ..."

If you are confused by the above quoted terms, then its time to study their deceptive vocabulary.

• Some people have direct allegiance similar to any enlisted military person.

• Others have signed a contract that subjects them to punishment by their masters. 

• Still others are responsible for using a government granted status, which subjects them to an in rem jurisdiction.

• Paupers (those supported at public expense), children, mentally incompetent.

• Those who have sworn a vow of poverty.

At what point does ownership of a slave begin and waiver of rights end? It is a very vague distinction. Somewhere in the gray area, you must mark your line in the sand. At what point will you divide asunder civic duty from duty to a master? At what point will you confess that you are a slave? Let's take a closer look.
 

NON-PERSONS

First, a simple definition so that you may understand your chain of command.

Law: The expressed will of the sovereign.

The Lord is the Christian's lawgiver (James 4:12, Isa 33:22). Christian's founded this country. Christians created Christian State governments, not pagan state governments. The Original State is the Church. An association of representatives of Christian States in a convention created your federal government. Congress could only assemble for the 17 reasons mentioned in Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution. The Untied States was at one time subordinate to the representatives of your Christian States' civil servants.

In Appendix D I have cited many proofs that non-persons exist and have rights. You are under the Almighty Sovereign's chain of command and He expects you to properly represent this authority.

According to Daniel Garcia's Law Brief, a Sovereign person retains all liberties. He is not part of a nation or state. Garcia claims that Alexander Hamilton was a sovereign non-Citizen. I have no reason to doubt it. Alexander Hamilton was never president. He was the first Secretary of the Treasury and as such he could not have been a citizen. His duties are to the Arch-treasurer of the United States (presuming, of course, that the United States has a right to exist). The borrower is a slave to the lender (Proverbs 22:7).

A sovereign may be a non-Citizen or a state Citizen. Let's examine both: 

• A non-citizen, such as Alexander Hamilton, keeps all his natural rights, but has no political rights. He is above man's government. A congressman does not represent him. A non-citizen cannot pay taxes or vote (as in the Supreme Court's Elk v. Wilkins case concerning a native American Indian). I repeat: A NON-CITIZEN HAS MORE RIGHTS THAN A CITIZEN. 

• A sovereign state citizen gives up some natural rights in exchange for political privileges. I'll discuss citizenship below, and in Appendix D. Only sovereigns (which include state citizens and non-citizens, but excludes federal citizens) can have access to the state's judicial powers, but this is almost extinct because there are so few left of this dwindling remnant still qualified to exercise this right.

• there is no such thing as a sovereign US citizen. As you will see, a US citizen is not above government, he is of [of = belonging to] government. "A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." (Kitchens v. Steele 112 F.Supp 383). For further proof, read your Constitution. Only state citizens can become President. No one from Washington DC can become President. No one from Washington DC can have political rights.

• If you understand this logic so far, you now understand why a non-citizen cannot have a right to work in the US. A non-citizen has more rights than a citizen of any state, but no one has a right to work within the Federal US government. The right to work in the US government is a government granted privilege. Any form that asks if you work in the US, such as an employer's I-9 form, is asking if you are working within the US government. Federal Congress makes laws for federal persons, they do not make laws for state citizens.

Black's Law Dictionary, first edition (published in 1891 long after the 13th Amendment) cites the definition of "Resident:" 

"RESIDENT: A tenant, who was obliged to reside on his lord's land, and not depart from the same, a resident may not be entitled to all the privileges or subject to all the duties of an inhabitant. 9 Wend. 11.

A Resident has no Personal liberty. Black's Law Dictionary, first edition gives us the definition of personal liberty: 

"Personal liberty consists in the power of locomotion, of changing situation, of removing one's person to whatever place one's inclination may direct, without imprisonment or restraint unless by due course of law. 1 Bl. Comm. 134"

Caution: only a resident can get a driver's license. If you apply for a license, you are confessing that you are obliged to reside on your lord's land, and not depart from the same, and are not entitled to all the privileges of an inhabitant. Further Proof: the Supreme Court keeps saying that states cannot regulate the right to travel by automobile. Shapiro v. Thompson 394 US 618 in 1969 and in US v. Wheeler 254 US 281, 293 in 1920 and in US v. Guest 383 US 745 in 1966. The right to travel is so basic that it is not even mentioned in your Constitution. If your right to travel is regulated, it is probably because you asked for permission to travel. There are hundreds of cases that prove this. I recommend the book "The Right to Travel" by Charles Weisman. If you want a simple 12 page brief on the subject, I recommend you buy a copy of the "Aid and Abet" newsletter for lawmen, issue No. 11 entitled "U.S. Courts Confirm Driving a Motor Vehicle is a Right Not Government Privilege." (Available from Aid and Abet, P.O. Box 8787, Phoenix, Arizona 85066).

Caution: only a resident can register to vote. If you register to vote you are confessing that you are obliged to reside on your lord's land, and not depart from the same, and are not entitled to all the privileges of an inhabitant. If this sounds like you are the secured collateral for a bond issue, there is a reason for this.

Caution: Before you go claiming that you are an inhabitant, know that the modern legal definition of inhabitant implies "a more fixed and permanent abode" than a resident. This is contrary to the use of this word in both the Articles of Confederation and in your Constitution. It is contrary to the use of the term "inhabitants" that is inscribed on the Liberty Bell. More about this, later. According to your Constitution, Presidents must be residents of their state, whereas Congressmen must be inhabitants of their state.

CITIZEN

Basic citizenship, non-citizenship, and forced citizenship: 

• Citizens are those who enter into a political society. They voluntarily give up some of their natural liberties in exchange for political privileges. They become subject to private law enforcement. They can be forced into court to settle disputes. They agree to a lien on their property to pay for any damages they cause. They agree to accept service of legal process.

• A non-citizen has not entered into a political society. Like Alexander Hamilton, they must resort to "on-street remedies" to settle disputes. 

• Citizenship by birth forces, involuntarily, someone into a political society. If this sounds too Catholic to you, there is probably a reason.

• If you live in one of the 20 states that still has your state borders defined by your state constitution [yes, there is a plot to systematically eliminate all states], then you will notice that your state constitution gives the judicial power of your state the authority to naturalize citizens. This is how naturalization happened for the first 100 years of your once great nation. Yet you cannot get your judicial courts to recognize this duty today. Apparently real state governments do not exist today, they were replaces by federal corporations masquerading as states.

• Representatives of State Citizens created your federal government, and they are responsible for controlling their creature. State Citizens are above your federal government. They are the masters of your federal government. Your federal government must obey its masters. State Citizens are the lords of their public servants. A representative takes an oath of office as worship to his lords. This is why your federal government has been systematically eliminating their masters. [There is interesting evidence that the original lordship still exists: the Mace of the United States must be present whenever Congress is in session. The Mace is an ornamented rack with 13 sticks, by which you could whip your insubordinate representatives.]

• US citizens, give up all natural rights in exchange for "civil" rights. All political authority is relinquished to politicians who will regulate citizens' travel, marriage, banking, medications, housing, occupations, guns, education, commerce, etc.

• Prior to the Fourteenth Amendment, there was no such thing as a federal citizen.

In Appendix C, I show that 14th Amendment citizenship in your Federal government is not the same as state citizenship. According to the Supreme Court, federal citizens cannot have protections from the first eight amendments. And I repeat: no one from Washington DC can have political rights or even run for President. Are you from Washington DC? You are if you checked a "US citizen" box on any form, or if you are a resident with a federal zip code address.

At the end of the Civil War a lawful method had to be created in order to care for the four million freed slaves who needed a way to survive. Since your Constitution has never allowed the government to give entitlements to people, Federal ownership was just one of the alternatives being considered for the "freed" slaves. Another alternative was a treaty whereby freed slaves would live in America as citizens of Liberia. Five hundred black families moved to Africa and established the country of Liberia, with the assurance of making a treaty with the US so that everyone could live free. Their constitution is almost identical to yours, except that only blacks can become citizens. They even named their Capital after an American president. In this ultimate battle between good and evil, the treaty never happened and Federal ownership is what we ended up with, where eventually no one could live free. Did your government school teach you this?
 
 

PERSON

In Appendix D, I quote court cases to show that a person is a non-sovereign. King George in the Treaty of Paris granted sovereignty to all Americans (while retaining title as Arch Treasurer). Those who submit to the laws of congress give up their sovereignty in exchange for a personage.

Sovereigns are those who are above the laws legislated by their servants. Persons are those who submit to legislated law. Later, I will show that the judicial branch of state government protects state citizens from legislated law.

Throughout history, those who ignore God are taken into captivity. You were tricked into becoming a person when you applied for a Social Security number.
 
 

ENFRANCHISED CITIZENS

In the olden days, enfranchised persons received rights and protections from a ruler to whom they owe allegiance. This hasn't changed. Enfranchised citizens are slaves on the federal plantation to whom they owe allegiance.

Black's Law Dictionary defines the legal maxim that Protection Draws Subjection:

"The protection of an individual by government is on condition of his submission to the laws, and such submission on the other hand entitles the individual to the protection of the government."

Further proof of this legal maxim is in the Black's Law Dictionarydefinition of "Allegiance:" 

"Obligation of fidelity and obedience to government in consideration for protection that government gives. U.S. v. Kuhn, D.C.N.Y., 49 F. Supp. 407, 414"

Now that you know what allegiance means, and now that you know the red beast of Revelation is socialism, and now that you know that a Russian general will always be in command of the UN military, perhaps you can now understand that George Bush correctly stated "It is those sacred principles enshrined in the UN Charter to which we must henceforth pledge our allegiance." Biblical principles remain true. Americans have sold their birthright. According to Jesus: Benefactors exercise authority.

Benefactors exercise authority. This is evident in the legal definitions that your government uses. The legal definition of 'enfranchisement" makes it seem that God given rights come from benefactors. Notice how the following legal definitions focus on benefits without mentioning the obligations attached to accepting the benefits. Notice how some of the government granted benefits are counterfeits of the rights that free people would have. According to Black's Law Dictionary today's lawyer definitions of `enfranchisement' include: 

• "The act of making free (as from slavery)."

• "Investiture with privileges or capacities of freedom, or municipal or political liberty."

• "Conferring the privilege of voting upon classes of persons who have not previously possessed such."

• "See also Franchise" Franchise includes the following definitions:

• "A special privilege to do certain things conferred by government on individual or corporation, and which does not belong to citizens generally of common right ... " 

• In England it is defined to be a royal privilege in the hands of a subject."

Again: Notice how these are government granted privileges that allow the person to exercise some of the rights of free people. But, like any privilege granted by government, they can be revoked.

I will also show you later that civil rights must be regulated, and that natural rights cannot be regulated. Real rights do not come from government. Government cannot grant rights, although they often refer to their privileges as rights.

You can read between the lines. These lawyer definitions use freedom and voting as examples of government granted "rights." At the risk of seeming too cynical: Livestock has owner granted rights also. Just because your current owner can be nice to you, doesn't mean you are free, nor does it mean you won't be sold. Just because you can vote for President, doesn't mean you are free. In fact, it is proof that you are a slave. Even the US Supreme Court says "the Constitution of the United States has not conferred the right of suffrage upon any one." (Minor v. Happersett and in US v. Cruikshank).

The courts have ruled that the Buck Act defines "an individual entity" as franchised persons of government. Springfield v. Kenny 104 NE2d 65 and Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox 298 US 193. Social Security and welfare are available only to federal citizens. Federal citizens cannot have rights. Social Security benefits are not available to state citizens. A state Citizen cannot obtain a Social Security Number without first obtaining a dual citizenship acknowledged by your federal government. By getting a number, you change your citizenship. (See Appendix C). By registering for the benefits available only to enfranchised persons, you become an enfranchised person. Only those persons receiving government benefits are required to have a social security number. No one else has ever been required to get a SSN.

WARD - "Guarding, caring, protecting." - "A person ... placed by a court under the care and supervision of a guardian or conservator."

I can prove that an attorney is your court appointed guardian, and is considered competent to manage your affairs, whereas you are considered incompetent to manage your own affairs.

Go to the Law Library and find the legal encyclopedia entitled "Corpus Juris Secundum." Look up "Attorney & Client" Section 4 in Volume 7 and read: "His first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client."

That's right: he represents the public, therefore he cannot represent you. (And don't be deceived by the word `public.' It means `government." Examples: public office, public housing, public roads, public library, public school, public law, and public records. And furthermore, as I digress further, the word "republic" comes from a Latin idiom `Libera res publica' which means "free from government things." This is from the Collin's Latin Dictionary. Even Webster's 1828 Dictionary says a Republic has only titular governmental powers. This is because they can only legislate to those who volunteer into their jurisdiction. Later, I will quote the Supreme Court's Meyer case to show that liberty is freedom from arbitrary regulations. Then I'll prove that lawyers cannot represent you according to the Supreme Court's Schware case).

Then look up `client': 

"A client is one who applies to a lawyer or counselor for advice and direction in a question of law, or commits his cause to his management ... one who communicates facts to an attorney expecting professional advice. Clients are also called "wards of the court" in regard to their relationship with their attorneys."

That's right! You must be crazy to talk to an attorney. You are not competent to manage your own affairs. Even asking "... for advice and direction in a question of law ..." or "expecting professional advice" proves that you cannot manage your own affairs. You do not have the law in your right hand and forehead.

You volunteered into an evil system that has absolute contempt for any timid soul who is too faint-hearted to resist his oppressors. This is the evil world we live in. Yet in Matthew 5:39 Christ requires you to tolerate attacks from evil people and turn the other cheek. These bullies will have absolute contempt for this behavior. They don't understand that you are obeying a higher authority.
 
 

ACCEPTING BENEFITS

Christ was correct that benefactors gain authority over you (Luke 22:25, but compare to Matt 20:25, Mark 10:42). "Rights" come only from responsibilities. If you cannot be responsible for providing for yourself, then don't expect any rights.

Did you pledge allegiance to your new lord? Here is what pledge means according to Strong's Concordance from the four words that are translated into the KJV word `pledge': 

• H6162. (in the sense of exchange) a pawn given as security.

• H2258. a pawn (as security for debt).

• H2254. to wind tightly (as a rope), i.e. to bind; specifically by a pledge; figuratively to pervert, destroy; also to writhe in pain.

• H6161. in the sense of a bargain or exchange; something given as security, i.e. (lit.) a token (of safety) or (metaphor) a bondsman:--pledge, surety.

The Act to Strengthen Public Credit, signed into law by Ulysses Grant on March 18, 1869, pledged every American citizen as collateral for the repayment of all government obligations, including the national debt. Your federal government did not own anything, the states and the people owned all the wealth. In order to get the central banks to print money, the banks wanted collateral. You are that collateral. A classic book on this topic is The Coming Battle by Martin W. Walbert, published in 1899.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Miller said: 

"The power of taxation is the power to destroy. No man who is endowed with a modest sum of intelligence would advocate a transfer of this immense power to a private corporation for its gain. It would amount to the self-destruction of the nation. No sane man would advocate the delegation of this high attribute of sovereignty to a corporation for its individual gain and such transfer of power would inevitably result in frightful oppression."

The following quote should answer any doubt that you have regarding the legitimacy of the chains attached to receiving benefits. US Supreme Court in Murdock v. Pennsylvania 319 US 105 at page 140: "The ultimate question in determining the constitutionality of a tax measure is -- has the state given something for which it can ask a return?"

Let's review the legal maxims. Protection draws subjection. The very definition of allegiance means you are obligated to obedience if you accept protection. The state has given something for which it can ask a return. A pledge of allegiance binds (Strong's H2254.) you as collateral. You grant the power of attorney if you allow them to manage your affairs because it is presumed that you cannot manage yourself. Christ said that benefactors exercise authority. You agree to obey your benefactors, no matter how evil they become. While you are in their house, you obey their rules. If you cannot govern yourself, others will govern you. No matter how much they demand. Whether you like it or not.

Now you understand that a pledge of allegiance binds you, and allegiance is an obligation to government in exchange for benefits, and that government was created (fabricated as an image) and receives worship and is a benefactor/provider. Perhaps you've worshiped the wrong provider.
 
 

STATE CITIZEN

State citizens ratified your Constitution to create your federal government. They are responsible for managing their creation. These citizens are sovereigns, and the legislature cannot and does not write laws for their masters (Matt 10:24, and John 15:20). Never could, still can't. You won't understand this yet, but State Citizens are not subject to the laws written by congress (see Appendix D). According to your Supreme Court in the Mulligan case, state courts must protect you from federal laws.

If you can be tricked into applying for benefits, you then become subject to their statutes. Whether you like it or not. No matter how evil they become.

The difference in citizenship is distinguished by whichever law of the land applies to you. State constitutions are founded on Christian principles. But, according to a Treaty signed by President Adams "... the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion ...." More about this later.
 
 

EMPLOYEE

An employee is someone (as is an indentured servant) who gives up legal rights to his labor in exchange for care and protection. The same people who own the IRS own his labor rights.

More about this later. But you won't like it.