An
Attorney, representing employees of an
IRS Regional Office, writes a Treatise regarding the
taxing of wages, salaries, and first time
commissions. This attorney provides you
with defenses, law origin and authorities,
how to handle a jury trial, how to handle your
own defense, discussion of law,
unacceptable defenses, tax evasion and
willful failure to file issues. This is a must
read Treatise.
Before
a tax law can be enforced, the U.S. Treasury Department
must publish their regulations in the Federal Register.
Here we find the IRS Forms to be used in
collecting internal revenue were published September
11, 1946. We find it interesting that the U.S.
Treasury Department has declared that no one is
required to file 1040 Forms if W-2
Forms are on file with the Bureau of Internal
Revenue (Internal Revenue Service). The
download may take time as you will be downloading three
JPG photos of the Federal Register.
In
order to understand the income tax, you must understand how it came
about and how it was originally meant to be collected. This is
a very informative book that will take you from the beginning of
history of the United States and the purpose of its
revenue laws. This is a must read book.
The
Internal Revenue Service is not an agency of the United States
government. It is true that not only can it NOT be
found in Title 31 U.S.C., but it is nowhere to be
found in the entirety of Title 5 U.S.C.. Read
on!!
For
several years, a rumor has been circulating that the employees
of the Internal Revenue Service do not file
tax returns. Here is what is purportedly to be an
inside Memo of the Internal Revenue Service that circulated
among its employees.
You
say that you are a Christian and you would never accept the "Mark of
the Beast" of Revelation 13:16-17.
Surprise!! - You may already have.
We
are living in a period of time where nearly everyone in the world
has been assigned a number. Every nation that has a
national debt is required by their multinational creditors
to track taxpayers' income. As you will soon
find out, treaties with multinational authorities require the
United States and other governments to issue
Social Security numbers. This treatise is well
documented, not only from the perspective of the
Holy Bible, but by the laws and court cases of
the United States. Be sure to study
the Appendixes.
IRS
1993 ADP Transaction Codes 
Have
you ever wondered what the numeric codes that appear on IRS
correspondance were all about? Here is a listing [1993 Ed.] of
the ADP Transaction Codes.
Frivolous
Tax Arguments
This
is a legal brief that appears to have been written by the United
States Department of Justice. This legal brief tells of all
the frivolous tax cases that have been brought before the federal
courts. If you want to challenge the tax laws, you need to
read this legal brief.
Have
you ever had your Bank Accounts, Salary/Wages, or
other Property levied/lien by the
Internal Revenue Service? Did you know that
most of those levies/liens were illegal?
Read on --
IRS
Tax Liens Outside Page Link
This is a video of a special meeting by
the Douglas County Board of Governors of
Roseland, Oregon. What is at issue is the
filing of "Notice of IRS Liens"
as "Liens" in the Recorders Office a
lawful act of the County Recorder. This meeting
takes place on November 7, 2007.
This
is an open letter that was written to IRS Revenue Agent,
Gary Comnick. The letter discloses
the fraud being used by the Internal Revenue Service
in its exercise of power to issue "Notices of Levy."
The letter was never rebutted by the IRS.
Mr. Ponsford
was under Criminal Investigation for failure to file
tax returns. This letter of Mr. Ponsford to
the IRS explaining his understanding of the tax laws that
resulted in the dismissal of the criminal investigation.
WARNING -
This PDF File is very large (26 pages) and it
will take several minutes to download. Best to use a
high speed Internet connection.
Paul
Andrew Mitchell has published a book that is designed to educate you
about federal income tax law, the Treasury regulations which
promulgate that law, and the various court decisions which have
interpreted both and has made his book available in an electronic
version on his web page. One of the main purposes of this
book is to explain how We, the American People, have been
deliberately deceived by government officials who have
systematically exploited this deception, to defraud us of our wealth
and our freedom.
The
United States District Court for the Virgin Islands decided an
important case in 1996. Cited as Burnett v. Commissioner,
KTC 1996-292 (D.V.I. 1996), the court stated that Subtitle A taxes
apply only to Washington, D.C. and the Territories.
This
letter was written by Attorney Larry Becraft and was mailed to
the Internal Revenue Service by Davvy Kidd.
The letter brings into question that the Internal Revenue
Service was never created by an enactment of law by
the Congress of the United States, an allegation that
has never been repudiated by the Internal Revenue Service.
This
is an introduction to the William Cooper Report (BATF/IRS Criminal Report)
by Dan Meador. Dan Meador fills in the gaps of
the Cooper Report.
Investigation
of the alleged Internal Revenue Service and the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has disclosed
a broad, premeditated conspiracy to defraud the Citizens
of the united States of America.
Examination of the United States Code,
the Code of Federal Regulations, the Statutes at Large,
Congressional Record, the Federal Register,
and Internal Revenue manuals, and many other
sources to numerous to list, reveals a crime of such
magnitude that words cannot adequately describe the betrayal of the
American people. What we have uncovered has clearly
been designed to circumvent the limitations of the Constitution
for the united States and implement the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO
within the 50 States.
Attorney
Larry Becraft gives a list of cases that have been
argued and lost in the Courts. Remember: the point
here is not whether an issue is morally, ethically,
theoretically, academically, lawfully or even "legally" correct!
The point is DOES IT WORK IN COURT and there
is already legal precedent which will blow you out of
the water if you use the argument.
This
is a slightly condensed, casually paraphrased transcript of tapes of
a seminar given in 1990 by Howard Freeman.
It was prepared to make available the knowledge and experience
of Mr. Freeman in his search for an accessible and
understandable explanation of the confusing state of the government
and the courts. It should be helpful to those who
may have difficulty learning from such lectures, or those who want
to develop a deeper understanding of this information without having
to listen to three or four hours of
recorded material.
Part
1. COURT PROCEDURE/ DUE
PROCESS The methodology used by the
federal courts and the Department of Justice to prevent any legal
challenge to the income tax from being brought before the court in
income tax cases is presented. The method, in violation of our most
basic constitutional right, has consistently been held to void any
claim of jurisdiction in cases where the plaintiff is other than the
Internal Revenue Service.
Part 2.
LIBERTY---THE RIGHT TO MAKE A
LIVING A citizen's Right to
Liberty secured by the Constitution has been repeatedly adjudicated
to include the right to pursue a livelihood, and such fundamental
constitutional rights are not suitable objects for taxation.
Part 3.
SPRINGER, POLLOCK, 16th
AMENDMENT The three items
consistently claimed to adjudicate/authorize a tax on wages and
salaries are reviewed and it is concluded they have been
misrepresented for decades in what appears to be blatant fraud. The
income tax imposed on an individual's wages or salary is a bald
faced sham without any claim to acceptable legal adjudication.
Part 4.
MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT
A motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action in a
willful failure to file case is based on the legal issues in Part
1. Reference books are identified for
edification.
Part 5.
HABEAS CORPUS/ CORUM NOBIS The
motion in Part 4
is reworked and expanded into an academic post conviction relief for
a willful failure to file conviction. Reference material and
procedural guidelines are offered.
Part 6. CORAM
NOBIS Is there any way to
challenge a conviction on a willful failure to file charge after
completion of sentence to remove probation
requirements/restrictions, eliminate payment of court imposed
fines, restore voting rights and gun ownership, remove a
public stigma, improve employment and credit potential,
etc.? Using the legal issues of Part 1
and the analysis of Parts 4
and 5, the
answer appears to be ‘Yes’ and without any
filing fee involved.
Part 7. PETITION
FOR CERTIORARI Will
certiorari be granted? The possibility is very remote.
Only a massive number of litigants, exposing their awareness that it
is the judicial system that is breaking the law, may eventually
compel the supreme court to consolidate the cases and address the
issue.
Part 8. CIVIL
PROCEDURE --- WEB
SITES AND ABUSIVE TAX SHELTERS Civil actions
are increasingly being filed in the courts on behalf of the IRS as a
request for the court to order an injunction to close down a website
for actions deemed undesirable by the IRS. Let us review the
standards of civil procedure to determine if the actions are in
compliance with Fifth Amendment requirements of due process.
To
the best of knowledge; almost every Church in the
United States has applied for corporate status and have
applied for an Internal Revenue tax exemption.
How does the government of the United States look
upon such status and exemptions? This paper
explains that when a Church incorporates and applies for
tax exemptions, the government looks upon the Church
as a corporate body of the state that is doing
business for profit. There is no such thing as a
"Tax Exempt Church."
Herein
is an index of several court cases that were ruled upon in
federal courts. These cases are listed so that you
may be better informed when preparing your own case.
To return back to this menu page, use your
web browser "Back" button.
Queen
Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:
S.I. 1997 NO. 1778
- The Social Security ( United States of America)
Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force
1st September 1997. At the Court at
Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997.
Now, therefore Her Majesty in pursuance of
section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the
Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all
other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by
and with advise of Her privy Council, to order,
and it is hereby ordered as follows:
"This
Order may be cited as the Social Security
(United States of America) Order 1997
and shall come into force on
1st September 1997."
Does
this give a new meaning to Federal Judge
William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his
orders from England? This order goes on to redefine
words in the Social Security Act and makes some
changes in United States Law.
|
Comments